[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
August 1978

A Bit of Heresy?

Author Affiliations

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Ave Cleveland, OH 44106

Arch Intern Med. 1978;138(8):1207. doi:10.1001/archinte.1978.03630330007003

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Hypertension remains undetected and/or untreated in a large number of individuals, and the limited medical facilities, manpower, and resources that are available to evaluate these cases demand a critical reassessment of how much is really necessary in the pretreatment examination of the hypertensive patient.

These limitations have led to the discard of the intravenous pyelogram and tests for pheochromocytoma as routine examinations. Now, in this issue of Archives (p 1211), Bartha and Nugent present data from a retrospective review of the records of 116 hypertensive patients to indicate that routine roentgenograms of the chest and ECGs did not materially influence decisions on the management of hypertension in any case. Their conclusion was, "... the value of routine chest roentgenograms and ECGs cannot be defended on the basis of their contribution to the workup of hypertension."

It is important to distinguish those examinations that are pertinent to the diagnosis and/or management of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview