[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1983

Mean Corpuscular Volume

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pathology, Graduate Hospital (Dr S. L. Fischer), and the Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology, Episcopal Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Temple University (Dr S. P. Fischer), Philadelphia. Dr S. L. Fischer is now with Jeanes Hospital, Philadelphia.

Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(2):282-283. doi:10.1001/archinte.1983.00350020108020
Abstract

Of the three time-honored RBC indices, it is only the mean corpuscular volume, (MCV) index that is alive and well. It is measured today directly by the automated instruments. It permits computation of the hematocrit reading (MCV × number of RBCs) as opposed to the preautomation era when the hematocrit reading was measured and the MCV calculated. The MCV allows a useful morphologic differential diagnosis of microcytic and macrocytic anemias.

In contradistinction, the other two indices, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) are of questionable use. The MCH, also calculated by automated instruments, varies in strict linear relationship with the MCV (Fig 1). It does not, therefore, offer any additional information over the MCV value. However, the MCHC is practically constant (Fig 2) with a mean of 34.8 ± 1.53 (mean ± SD).

A low MCHC, traditionally the characteristic feature of iron deficiency, is not seen

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×