[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1986

Single-Dose Antibiotic Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections and Type II Error

Author Affiliations

Holyoke, Mass

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(2):413. doi:10.1001/archinte.1986.00360140269043
Abstract

To the Editor.  —In their article regarding single-dose antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infections, Drs Philbrick and Bracikowski1 emphasized that the studies they examined did not have sample sizes large enough to guard against a type II error. Therefore, the finding of "no statistically significant difference" between single-dose and multiple-dose therapy may be erroneous. The importance of the type II error and sample size in the interpretation of "negative" trials has been examined by other authors as well.2-4When Philbrick and Bracikowski reanalyzed the results using pooled data, they found a statistically significant difference in the cure rates from studies comparing single- and multiple-dose therapy with ampicillin or amoxicillin but no significant difference in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole studies. Even with pooled data, however, the sample sizes for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy were not large enough to guard against a type II error.After this meticulous analysis, the authors make a

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×