[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 1986

Another Base for Occupational Medicine-Reply

Author Affiliations

New Haven, Conn

Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(2):414. doi:10.1001/archinte.1986.00360140270046

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


I appreciate the thoughts and endeavors of my colleagues at Arizona who have, among federally funded occupational medicine residency programs, placed perhaps the greatest emphasis on clinical experience and expertise. I think, however, that they have somewhat misunderstood the teaching-research model that we have evolved at Yale and thereby underrated its potential to serve the ends we commonly seek.

Although our Occupational Medicine Program is, indeed, nested within a major tertiary care medical center, our clinics have not drawn primarily from within this referral center but rather have used the base to draw, broadly, from without. Over 95% of all patients are seen first (and exclusively) as outpatients; over 80% have never previously been to Yale. We see, in our own "specialty," a spectrum of pathology similar to that seen by other specialists—a population referred for possible/probable occupational disease. Not surprisingly, we see both an extraordinary range of illness and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview