[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.119.171. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1987

Withholding or Withdrawing Treatment

Author Affiliations

Cincinnati

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(5):992-994. doi:10.1001/archinte.1987.00370050184034
Abstract

To the Editor.  —I read with great interest the letter by Rosner in the January 1987 issue of the Archives1 regarding withholding nutritional support from dying patients. Rosner quoted the American Medical Association's position that "it is not unethical to discontinue... life-prolonging medical treatment, [which] includes medication... nutrition and hydration" in selected patients.2 Rosner objected to the position, giving the following insight: when a physician can offer nothing to cure a patient, his responsibility as a physician ends, and his responsibility to the patient becomes that of a regular moral lay person; that is, to comfort, visit, console, and feed the patient. Rosner then suggests that we need not give medication or transfusions to the dying patient, but we are obligated to nourish and hydrate the dying patient, as any moral layman would.While I find his guidelines for a physician's responsibility to the dying patient simple and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×