[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.107.222. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1987

An Anesthesiologist's Philosophy on 'Medical Clearance' for Surgical Patients

Author Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology St Elizabeth Hospital 225 Williamson St Elizabeth, NJ 07207

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(12):2090-2092. doi:10.1001/archinte.1987.00370120026007
Abstract

The preoperative medical consultation provides an opportunity for the internist or medical subspecialist to contribute to a better surgical outcome for the patient. Medical review is requested to be sure that nothing related to the patient's present status, which might affect the outcome of anesthesia and surgery, is missed. Unfortunately, I have seen preoperative medical consultations that contained statements that were unnecessary and offensive, and could even put the anesthesiologist in a medicolegally awkward position. As a practicing anesthesiologist, I believe that these consultations could be made more useful if internists understood the point of view of the anesthesiologist. Here I wish to share my philosophy on medical consultation with medical consultants in order to help streamline their thoughts.

The following are statements commonly seen in preoperative medical consultations, and reasons why the statements may be objectionable to an anesthesiologist:

"No absolute contraindication to general anesthesia." It is the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×