[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1988

The Unproven Utility of Preoperative UrinalysisClinical Use

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital, San Antonio, and Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio.

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(6):1370-1373. doi:10.1001/archinte.1988.00380060134025
Abstract

• We investigated the utility, ie, relevance to clinical outcome, of routine preoperative urinalysis with a retrospective study of 200 clean-wound, orthopedic, nonprosthetic knee procedures. Physicians primarily order a preoperative urinalysis to detect infection, because of the purported relationship between remote infection and surgical wound infection. We found that preoperative urinalysis is uniformly ordered, with a high prevalence of abnormal results (15%) but a low physician-response rate (29%). Wound infection was rare, but there was no difference in frequency of wound infection between patients with normal and abnormal results of urinalysis. We conclude that the utility of routine preoperative urinalysis is unproven. Current practice does not agree with the rationale for ordering this test, nor does published literature support it. Although data are inadequate to fully define the appropriate use of preoperative urinalysis, we suggest clinical recommendations and avenues for further research.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1370-1373)

×