[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.142.219. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1990

The Incidence and Prognosis of Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction-Reply

Author Affiliations

Honolulu, Hawaii

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(6):1350. doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390180148039
Abstract

In Reply.—We appreciate Dr Spodick's comments on our article. We fully agree with the notion that Q-wave infarctions and non—Q-wave (or S-T) infarctions differ clinically, physiologically, and prognostically, but cannot be anatomically differentiated by electrocardiography.1 In our article we used the terms "transmural" (Q-wave) and "subendocardial" (non—Q-wave) infarction simply because many physicians still use these anatomical and electrocardiographic terms indistinctly. We did not intend to equate either the presence of abnormal Q- (or QS-) waves and the anatomical lesion of transmural infarction, or the absence of Q waves and subendocardial infarction.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×