[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.142.219. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1991

The Evaluation of Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus—Related Disorders and Brain Mass Lesions

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Cimino, Lipton, and Feraru), Neurosurgery (Drs Williams and Hirschfeld), and Infectious Disease (Dr Harris), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(7):1381-1384. doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400070137018
Abstract

In patients at risk for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who present with a mass lesion, a dilemma arises as to whether to treat empirically for toxoplasmosis or perform a brain biopsy. We present data that further define the indications for performing brain biopsy vs empiric treatment. We reviewed charts on 59 patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome—related disorders and cerebral mass lesions. Thirty-two patients met diagnostic criteria for toxoplasmosis. Bayesian analysis demonstrated that the prior probability of toxoplasmosis was increased by the presence of contrast enhancement on computed tomographic scans (0.68) and toxoplasmosis titers greater than 1:64 (0.81). Features associated with decreasing probabilities of toxoplasmosis included the absence of contrast enhancement on computed tomographic scans (0.29) and toxoplasmosis titers less than or equal to 1:64 (0.14). Ten percent of patients had complications of brain biopsy. Treatment with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine produced complications in 29% and serious complications in 8% of treated patients. These data favor empiric therapy for patients with typical features of toxoplasmosis and brain biopsy for defined subsets of patients with atypical features.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1381-1384)

×