[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.92.239.248. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 14, 1994

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and the Cost of Death

Author Affiliations

Jamaica, NY

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(3):348. doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420030164020
Abstract

I am disturbed by the implications of the conclusion of Maksoud et al that "total hospital and professional charges are significantly lower when a patient is admitted with an established nonresuscitation order compared with those for whom a do-not-resuscitate order is established while in the hospital."1 Costs are less because less is done for the patient diagnostically and therapeutically. Unless a patient gives specific instructions not to be treated with dialysis, antibiotics, blood transfusions, and the like, these modalities of treatment should be given where appropriate. To withhold anything but cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not part of a do-not-resuscitate order. The latter is limited to resuscitation following cardiopulmonary arrest.

Patients should be encouraged to make their wishes known through advance directives such as living wills or health care proxy designations. However, the patient's desire not to be resuscitated does not limit in any way the patient's right to receive all

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×