[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 26, 1995

Calculating Gains in Life Expectancy With Risk Factor Reduction

Author Affiliations

Chicago, Ill

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(12):1332. doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430120123019
Abstract

In a recent article, Bates et al1 reported that certain clinical laboratory test results distinguished a group of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome from a group of healthy control subjects. They stated that "this observation suggests the presence of a biological process or processes that may contribute to, or be responsible for, the symptoms of CFS." What is the alternative explanation for the symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome if not a biological process or processes? Would the absence of a difference on those objective clinical laboratory tests suggest that it was something else? Surely, the authors do not mean to imply that when patients have symptoms of chronic fatigue in the absence of abnormal laboratory test results, such symptoms are "in their heads."

Given our abandonment of the notion of Cartesian mind/body dualism, it would only mean that we had not yet found the right test.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×