[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
January 8, 1996

Postdischarge Geriatric Assessment of Hospitalized Frail Elderly Patients

Author Affiliations

From the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Siu); UCLA Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Hemmerling, Kington, Davis, Morgenstern, Beers, and Reuben and Ms Mitchell); RAND Health Program, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Keeler and Burton); and University of California at Davis School of Medicine (Dr Kravitz).

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(1):76-81. doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440010094012

Background:  The diffusion of comprehensive geriatric assessment services has been rather limited in North America partly because of reimbursement and organizational constraints.

Objective:  To evaluate the impact of a comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention for frail older patients that is started before hospital discharge and is continued at home.

Methods:  Patients older than 65 years were selected who had either unstable medical problems, recent functional limitations, or potentially reversible geriatric clinical problems. Patients (n=354) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or a control group. Information on survival, readmissions, nursing home placement, medication use, and health status was collected at 30 and 60 days after hospital discharge.

Results:  No differences were observed between the two treatment groups in survival, hospital readmission, or nursing home placement by 60 days. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, no significant differences were observed between the two groups on measures of physical functioning, social functioning, role limitations, health perceptions, pain, mental health, energy and/or fatigue, health change, or overall well-being.

Conclusions:  Although efficacy has been demonstrated for some forms of comprehensive geriatric assessment, the types of services that are easier to establish (inpatient consultation services and ambulatory assessment) have not been shown to improve outcomes. Our results indicate that outcomes are unaffected by a limited form of comprehensive geriatric assessment begun in the hospital and completed at home. Further efforts are needed to develop and to evaluate realistic approaches to comprehensive geriatric assessment.(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:76-81)