[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.65.30. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 8, 1997

Thrombolytic Therapy for Pulmonary EmbolismIs It Effective? Is It Safe? When Is It Indicated?

Author Affiliations

Department of Medicine The University of Arizona College of Medicine 1501 N Campbell Ave Tucson, Ariz 85724-5018; Hamilton, Ontario

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(22):2550-2556. doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440430026003
Abstract

MORE than 30 years after the first clinical reports of thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE)1,2 its indications still remain uncertain. The most widely accepted indication for thrombolytic therapy for PE is in patients with hypotension secondary to massive PE.3 However, the number of patients with PE who present with shock and who do not have 1 or more contraindications to thrombolytic treatment is very small.

The first 2 thrombolytic agents that were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute PE were streptokinase (1977) and urokinase (1978). These 2 agents were compared with heparin in 2 randomized clinical trials.4,5

The successful results of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction led to its evaluation for the treatment of acute PE. The first report of rt-PA in the treatment of PE by Bounameaux

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×