[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
September 24, 2001

Clinical Research Requires IRB Review

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(17):2151. doi:

I read the letter by Davis and Walsh1 and the response by Lawlor et al2 in the January 21, 2001, issue of the ARCHIVES. Davis and Walsh are correct in pointing out that any mention of oversight by a research review body was missing from the original article. The explanation given by Lawlor and colleagues, that the research was not more than is usually done in the clinical setting and therefore was not subject to review when the study was developed, was an insufficient reason for failure to obtain approval of the research protocol prior to its implementation and regular (at least annual) oversight on an ongoing basis.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview