Daien V, Pérès K, Villain M, Colvez A, Delcourt C, Carrière I. Visual Impairment, Optical Correction, and Their Impact on Activity Limitations in Elderly Persons: The POLA Study. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(13):1206-1207. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.140
Author Affiliations: Inserm U1061, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France (Drs Daien and Carrière); Department of Ophthalmology, Gui De Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier (Drs Daien and Villain); Inserm U897, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France (Drs Pérès and Delcourt); and Inserm, Caisse Nationale pour la Solidarité et l'Autonomie, Montpellier, France (Dr Colvez).
The loss of autonomy among older persons is a major public health issue. In the disablement process model,1 chronic and acute conditions lead to psychological and physical deficiencies and ultimately to difficulty in performing activities of daily life. In elderly persons, visual impairment is one of the major deficiencies leading to activity limitations and can be caused by either eye trauma or ocular diseases (affecting the ability to receive or process visual information), or by refractive errors (a failure of the eye to focus images sharply on the retina). Refractive errors affect approximately a third of the US and Western European populations.2
We estimated the proportion of uncorrected refractive errors and the potential improvement in daily life functioning that could be brought about by optimal visual correction.
The POLA (Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l'Age) Study, described in detail previously,3 aimed to identify risk factors for age-related eye diseases. The present study included the 1947 persons, 63 years and older, who completed the 3-year follow-up (1998-2000). Participants were administered standardized questionnaires and were assessed for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) limitations4 (participants unable to perform without assistance at least 1 of the 8 activities of the Lawton scale). Eye examinations, performed by 5 ophthalmologists in a mobile unit equipped with ophthalmologic devices, included a measure of distance visual acuity in each eye, with the participants' usual optical correction (or no correction if they did not wear glasses or contact lenses) and then with the best achieved correction determined using objective refraction (RM-A7000; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) and lenses of varying power.
Distance visual acuity was assessed with the Snellen decimal chart and analyzed by extending the World Health Organization taxonomy of visual impairment. “Low vision” (including blindness) and “moderate visual impairment” were defined as visual acuity in the better eye lower than 6/18 and 6/18 to 6/12, respectively. The “unilateral visual loss group” included participants with visual acuity worse than 6/12 for one eye and normal for the other eye and the “normal group” those with 6/6 to 6/12 in each eye.
To assess the proportion of IADL limitations that could be prevented with the use of the best achieved correction, the generalized impact fraction (GIF) of inappropriate optical correction was estimated using equations previously described5 and stratified by age group (63 to 74 years vs ≥75 years). The age-stratified GIFs were combined using a case-load weighed sum method for an overall GIF.6 The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by bootstrapping.
Of the 1947 participants 3.0% were excluded owing to missing data, leaving 1887 participants (804 men and 1083 women) for this analysis. The median age was 72.3 years (interquartile range, 68.1-77.0), and 10.3% of participants (195) had IADL limitations.
Moderate visual impairment and low vision were much more frequent in subjects with IADL limitations (39.0% vs 23.3% and 24.1% vs 5.6%, respectively) but not unilateral visual loss. Overall, 38.5% of participants had an inappropriate optical correction, which accounted for 64.5% and 50.4% of the cases of moderate visual impairment and low vision, respectively.
The overall GIF, which represents the fractional reduction of activity limitations resulting from changing the usual visual correction to the best achieved visual correction (Table), was estimated at 20.5% (95% CI, 13.6%-27.9%). We were not able to adjust the GIF calculation for all possible confounders because of sparse data6; however, age was the only obvious confounding factor when we examined the association between vision and activity limitations (adjusting for sex, living alone, smoking, alcohol, body mass index, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, antidepressant use, and hospitalization).
Among this noninstitutionalized elderly population, the majority of cases of low vision and moderate visual impairment were due to uncorrected refractive errors. One-fifth of IADL limitations could be prevented by use of the best optical correction. Our results underline the importance of including eye examinations in cohorts studying disability and integrating ophthalmic surveillance in routine evaluation of elderly persons.
According to the 2009 American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations, people older than 65 years should have eye examinations every 1 to 2 years. This is critical not only to detect eye diseases but also to measure refractive errors (which vary with age) and to correct these with glasses or contact lens. Programs designed to provide optical services in this population may contribute to maintaining activities and autonomy in elderly persons.
Correspondence: Dr Carrière, Inserm U1061, Hopital La Colombiere, 39 Ave C Flahault, BP 34493, 34093 Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: April 11, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.140
Author Contributions: Drs Delcourt and Carrière had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Delcourt and Carrière. Acquisition of data: Colvez and Delcourt. Analysis and interpretation of data: Daien, Pérès, Villain, Delcourt, and Carrière. Drafting of the manuscript: Daien and Carrière. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pérès, Villain, Colvez, and Delcourt. Statistical analysis: Daien and Carrière. Obtained funding: Colvez and Delcourt. Study supervision: Villain and Carrière.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France; by grants from the Fondation de France, Department of Epidemiology of Ageing, Paris, the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, Paris; the Région Languedoc-Roussillon, Montpellier, France; and the Association Retina-France, Toulouse; and by financial support from Rhônes Poulenc, Essilor, Specia, and Horiba ABX (Montpellier) and the Centre de Recherche et d'Information Nutritionnelle (Paris).
Role of the Sponsors: These sponsors funded the preparation of the POLA study and the data collection.