Turchin A, Goldberg SI, Breydo E, Shubina M, Einbinder JS. Copy/Paste Documentation of Lifestyle Counseling and Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: True to Form?. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1393-1400. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.219
Author Affiliations: Divisions of Endocrinology (Drs Turchin and Shubina) and General Medicine (Dr Einbinder), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School and Clinical Informatics Research and Development, Partners HealthCare System, Boston (Drs Turchin, Breydo, and Einbinder); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Goldberg).
Electronic medical records (EMRs) can improve many aspects of patient care.1 Utilization of EMRs is increasing and is particularly encouraged by recent federal legislation.2 However, EMRs are not always used optimally. Concerns have been raised about inappropriate copying and pasting of information between health care provider notes.3,4 Up to 50% of the content of progress notes may be copied from older documents,5,6 and copying frequently leads to errors in documentation.6 However, whether copied text generally reflects the care delivered is not known.
Lifestyle counseling improves outcomes in patients with diabetes and is recommended by treatment guidelines.7 Narrative notes by health care providers are the primary source of information on whether lifestyle counseling was provided. However, if copying and pasting of note fragments does not reflect treatment, the information contained in narrative electronic documents may not be reliable.
We performed a retrospective study of more than 5000 patients with diabetes to determine the relationship between copied lifestyle counseling documentation and glucose control.
Adult patients with diabetes followed by primary care physicians affiliated with 2 academic hospitals for at least 2 years between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2005, were studied. A single “hyperglycemic” period served as the unit of analysis. A hyperglycemic period starts at the first available hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement of 7.0% or greater and ends at the first HbA1c measurement lower than 7.0% or at the end of the study period if HbA1c never reached treatment target. “Duplicate lifestyle counseling” was defined as counseling documented using a sentence identical to the sentence used to document the same type of counseling in the previous note by the same health care provider; otherwise counseling was deemed to be “distinct.”
We used specially designed software to identify 3 types of lifestyle counseling in narrative EMR notes: diet counseling, exercise counseling, and weight loss counseling. The software was validated against 600 randomly selected notes manually reviewed by 2 reviewers.
A marginal Cox proportional hazards model for clustered data was used to estimate the effect of monthly rates of distinct and duplicate lifestyle counseling on time to HbA1c control while adjusting for covariates and accounting for clustering within individual patients.
The institutional review board at Partners HealthCare System approved the study.
The software sensitivity against the manual review consensus ranged from 91.4% to 97.4% and specificity from 88.2% to 94.7% for different categories of lifestyle counseling. We used the software to process 62 934 primary provider notes of 5914 patients with diabetes followed for a mean of 3.7 years during the study period. Their HbA1c level was above the recommended target for 67% of that time. Nonobese patients had 0.25 and obese patients 0.29 encounters per month with primary care providers during their hyperglycemic periods that documented lifestyle counseling. Overall, 5.0% of diet counseling, 5.1% of exercise counseling, and 5.2% of weight loss counseling documentation was duplicate. On average, a duplicate counseling documentation appeared 3.07 times in the notes of the same health care provider for the same patient, but only 0.099 times in the notes of the same health care provider for his or her other study patients (P < .001), consistent with copy and paste rather than use of templates as the mechanism for the generation of duplicate records.
In multivariable analysis adjusted for the patients' demographic characteristics, initial HbA1c measurement, frequency of HbA1c measurement, treatment with insulin, frequency of medication intensification, frequency of encounters with primary care providers and clustering within individual patients and primary care providers, an increase in 1 monthly episode of any distinct lifestyle counseling was associated with a hazard ratio of 4.35 (P < .001)for reaching HbA1c target; the results were similar for individual counseling categories (Table). Duplicate counseling was not associated with faster HbA1c control.
In this large retrospective study of copied documentation of lifestyle counseling in patients with diabetes, we have demonstrated that, unlike original records, copied documentation of lifestyle counseling was not associated with improvement in glucose control. In fact, its effect on HbA1c was undistinguishable from no counseling at all. These findings were consistent for all 3 types of lifestyle counseling we analyzed—diet, exercise, and weight loss. These results lead us to question whether copied electronic documentation is a reliable representation of patient care. If it is not, it could be either an honest mistake or deliberate falsification. In the latter case, copied documentation that does not reflect the actual events is a serious breach of medical ethics. In either case, it carries a significant financial and legal risk.8
Efforts must therefore be made to decrease the incidence of inappropriately copied electronic documentation. These could include training and education of health care providers as well as technical solutions, such as software that automatically detects overly similar notes or their components. In order for EMRs to benefit patients, we must make sure the information they contain is meaningful.
Correspondence: Dr Turchin, Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: May 23, 2011. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.219
Author Contributions: Drs Turchin and Goldberg contributed equally to this work. Dr Turchin had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Turchin, Goldberg, and Breydo. Acquisition of data: Turchin, Goldberg, and Breydo. Analysis and interpretation of data: Turchin, Goldberg, Breydo, Shubina, and Einbinder. Drafting of the manuscript: Turchin. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Goldberg, Breydo, Shubina, and Einbinder. Statistical analysis: Shubina. Obtained funding: Turchin. Study supervision: Turchin.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: Drs Turchin, Goldberg, Breydo, and Shubina received funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Library of Medicine. Dr Turchin has also received funding from the Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation.
Additional Contributions: Trevor Mathews and Simone Zhang helped in the validation of the natural language processing software.