[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Table. Agreement Between Post–Positron Emission Tomography (PET) National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) Management Strategies and Medicare Services Received in 489 Scans
Table. Agreement Between Post–Positron Emission Tomography (PET) National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) Management Strategies and Medicare Services Received in 489 Scans
1.
Lindsay MJ, Siegel BA, Tunis SR,  et al.  The National Oncologic PET Registry: expanded Medicare coverage for PET under coverage with evidence development.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(4):1109-1113PubMedArticle
2.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  National coverage determination (NCD) for FDG PET for brain, cervical, ovarian, pancreatic, small cell lung, and testicular cancers (220.6.14). https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.aspx?NCDId=295& ncdver=2& NCAId=92& ver=19& NcaName=Positron+Emission+Tomography+& bc=BEAAAAAAIAAA& . Accessed February 10, 2012
3.
Tunis SR, Pearson SD. Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare's ‘coverage with evidence development’.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(5):1218-1230PubMedArticle
4.
Hillner BE, Liu D, Coleman RE,  et al.  The National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR): design and analysis plan.  J Nucl Med. 2007;48(11):1901-1908PubMedArticle
5.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Liu D,  et al.  Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry.  J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(13):2155-2161PubMedArticle
6.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF,  et al.  The impact of positron emission tomography (PET) on expected management during cancer treatment: findings of the National Oncologic PET Registry.  Cancer. 2009;115(2):410-418PubMedArticle
7.
Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF,  et al.  Relationship between cancer type and impact of PET and PET/CT on intended management: findings of the national oncologic PET registry.  J Nucl Med. 2008;49(12):1928-1935PubMedArticle
8.
Tunis S, Whicher D. The National Oncologic PET Registry: lessons learned for coverage with evidence development.  J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6(5):360-365PubMedArticle
Research Letters
Apr 23, 2012

Comparing Physician-Reported Cancer Management Plans With Medicare Services Received

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Division of Hematology and Oncology (Dr Reeder-Hayes), Departments of Radiology (Dr Henderson), Medicine (Dr Reeder-Hayes), Health Policy and Management (Dr Carpenter), and Radiation Oncology (Dr Chen), and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (Drs Reeder-Hayes, Carpenter, and Chen), and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (Drs Carpenter and Chen), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence, Cary, North Carolina (Ms Hinton).

Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(8):664-666. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.271
×