Case Report/Case Series
August 2014

Hypertrabeculation vs Left Ventricular Noncompaction on EchocardiogramA Reason to Restrict Athletic Participation?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medicine/Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 2Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 3Department of Sports Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 4Sports Medicine, Campus Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 5Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(8):1379-1382. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1066

Importance  Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare cause of progressive cardiomyopathy thought to result from incomplete myocardial development. It has been associated with an increased risk of sudden death, especially in those with a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Thus, the current recommendation for patients with this diagnosis is restriction from participation in competitive sports.

Observations  An asymptomatic 18-year-old African American collegiate football player had a murmur on his preparticipation physical examination. Subsequent cardiology workup revealed hypertrabeculation vs LVNC. Second and third opinions were sought from national experts in the field: one gave the diagnosis of LVNC and recommended restriction; the other gave the diagnosis of hypertrabeculation. After a family meeting including the player, mother, team physician, and consulting cardiologist, the player was permitted to participate in football.

Conclusions and Relevance  Distinguishing between pathologic LVNC and physiologic hypertrabeculation is a diagnostic challenge and is becoming increasingly commonplace with enhanced echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. Given the limited data on such patients, careful workup and discussion between patient and providers is required.

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) was first recognized in 19321 but was not officially described until 1990.2 Thought to be secondary to the arrest of normal myocardial development, LVNC results in multiple deep trabeculations in the left ventricle.3 Clinical manifestations vary widely from asymptomatic to progressive deterioration resulting in heart failure.4 Left ventricular noncompaction is considered a cause of sudden cardiac death due to severe systolic dysfunction and fatal arrhythmias. Reports of sudden death in those with LVNC range between 2% and 62%, with one recent study reporting a death rate of 5% occurring exclusively in patients with a history of symptomatic heart failure, chest pain, syncope, or episodes of palpitations.5 Up to 40% of patients with LVNC have some evidence of familial disease.3 We report a case of an asymptomatic college athlete whose potential diagnosis of LVNC was first discovered on a preparticipation physical examination. Approval from the institutional review board was waived, but written consent was obtained from the patient.

Report of a Case

An 18-year-old African American male football player sought treatment at a cardiology clinic after a murmur was heard during his preparticipation physical examination. He had no symptoms of chest pain, lightheadedness, dizziness, or syncopal or presyncopal episodes. His medical history was significant for well-controlled asthma. Family history was negative for premature coronary disease, heart failure, or sudden death of any kind. At presentation, his vital signs were within normal limits, and the examination showed no abnormalities except for a soft systolic murmur.

A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm, sinus arrhythmia, anterior early repolarization pattern, inverted T wave in V1, and biphasic T wave in lead III (Figure 1). Given the new murmur, an echocardiogram was ordered and revealed hypertrabeculation but normal systolic function (Figure 2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated apical hypertrabeculation without evidence of segmental myocardial thinning and normal apical contractility (Figure 3). The differential diagnosis at this point was normal variant hypertrabeculation left ventricle vs LVNC.

Figure 1.
Image not available
Electrocardiogram Performed at Initial Visit

Twelve-lead electrocardiogram showing sinus rhythm, sinus arrhythmia, anterior early repolarization pattern, inverted T wave in V1, and biphasic T wave in lead III.

Figure 2.
Image not available
Echocardiogram Revealing Hypertrabeculation but Normal Systolic Function

A, Increased ventricular wall thickness. The left ventricular ejection fraction is more than 55%. B, Prominent trabeculation of the apical portion of the left ventricle with deep intertrabecular recesses. Arrowhead in each view indicates area of hypertrabeculation.

Figure 3.
Image not available
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Apical Hypertrabeculation Without Segmental Myocardial Thinning

Magnetic resonance image showing no apical thrombi and no evidence of systolic dysfunction. Arrowhead indicates area of hypertrabeculation.

Out of concern for LVNC, and in accordance with the 36th Bethesda Guidelines, the patient was advised to refrain from intense exertional activity.6 Given his strong desire to play football, we sought the opinions of two nationally known experts on cardiomyopathies. Expert 1 performed an exercise stress echocardiogram, which was unremarkable. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed a thick to thin compacted layer ratio of 3.2:1, consistent with a diagnosis of LVNC (Zurich and Milwaukee echocardiogram criteria >2:1).7 Expert 1’s interpretation of our MRI confirmed the diagnosis of LVNC, showing prominent trabeculations in the left ventricular cavity extending to the apex, and established a ratio of nontrabeculated to compacted myocardium of 3:1 (Petersen MRI criteria ratio >2.3:1).8,9 A 24-hour Holter monitor to rule out nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and aspirin, 81 mg/d, for stroke prevention were recommended. An implantable cardiac defibrillator was deferred since the patient was asymptomatic with a preserved ejection fraction. Notably, Expert 1 recommended that the patient continue to refrain from organized sports and avoid “burst exertional” activity, although recreational aerobic activity would be regarded as safe.

Expert 2 performed an exercise treadmill test, which was negative for arrhythmia. A transthoracic echocardiogram again showed an ejection fraction of 60% and left ventricular trabeculations at the apex potentially consistent with LVNC. However, the noncompacted to compacted segment ratio determined was 1.8, which did not meet the criteria for LVNC.7 A 24-hour Holter monitor again did not record any ventricular ectopy. Expert 2 concluded that, given normal wall motion as well as a normal enhancement pattern without evidence of strain, this case represented a “normal variant in a black athlete” rather than pathologic LVNC. Furthermore, unlike Expert 1, Expert 2 recommended that the patient be allowed to return to full athletic competition but repeat the 24-hour Holter monitor and cardiac MRI in 2 to 3 months. In addition, it was proposed that all first-degree relatives undergo echocardiographic screening.


The discussions with the consultants were reviewed with the patient, family, and the team physicians. We decided that despite conflicting opinions and a likely low yet unquantified risk of sudden death, it would be in the patient’s best interest to return to play. The patient returned to full athletic participation. He has performed very well, has remained asymptomatic, and is reevaluated annually. Family screening echocardiograms have been negative for abnormalities.

Left ventricular noncompaction is characterized by a prominent trabecular meshwork and deep intratrabecular recesses that extend into the left ventricular wall. It is believed to be caused by the arrest of normal intrauterine myocardial morphogenesis.2 Left ventricular noncompaction is an extremely rare cardiomyopathy with a prevalence of less than 0.3% in the adult population.3 Hypertrabeculation also can be seen in association with a number of other cardiac abnormalities as well as in the healthy heart. In the largest study of its kind, Gati et al10 used echocardiography to show that athletes had a higher prevalence of hypertrabeculation compared with nonathletes (18.3% vs 7%). This finding was even more pronounced in African and Afro-Caribbean athletes, but only a small proportion experienced systolic dysfunction and marked repolarization suggestive of cardiomyopathy. Captur et al11 applied fractal geometry analysis to cardiac MRI to quantify left ventricular trabeculation. They showed increased trabeculation in healthy African Americans compared with healthy whites. Interestingly, a large proportion of patients with sickle cell disease demonstrate increased left ventricular trabeculation that meets diagnostic criteria for LVNC, while it is unlikely they have LVNC.12 It was hypothesized that hypertrabeculation could be an ethnically determined adaptation to increased preload seen in both sickle cell disease and athletic training.

Typical clinical manifestations of LVNC that occur equally in adults and children include the triad of heart failure, arrhythmia, and embolic events.2 Electrocardiographic findings often demonstrate left ventricular hypertrophy with increased voltages, inverted T waves, and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.13 There is no pathognomonic histologic feature to aid in the diagnosis of LVNC, although fibrosis has been reported.14 Diagnosis is usually made using echocardiography with increasing use of cardiac MRI. Jenni et al7 defined LVNC as a ratio of the thick noncompact layer to the thin compact layer of more than 2.0, as measured in the short-axis view. Using MRI, Petersen et al8 defined LVNC as a ratio between noncompact and compact layers of more than 2.3 at end-diastole. Magnetic resonance imaging technology has improved the definition of the anatomy but is not as accessible as echocardiography, especially in the context of preparticipation screening.

The patient’s case emphasizes the caveats of preparticipation screening. He was a highly recruited athlete expected to compete at an extreme level, and obtaining an echocardiogram to assess a new murmur was reasonable. The incidental findings suggestive of LVNC, beyond the obvious medical impact, could have curtailed his collegiate career immediately as well as his prospects as a professional athlete. We were faced with a controversial diagnosis that, unlike conditions such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and long QT syndrome, has limited data associated with it to guide management. Regardless of guidelines, expert consultation should be considered in challenging cases such as ours to provide the patient and family and his or her health care providers with as much information as possible before deciding on participation or restriction.


To our knowledge, no reported cases of sudden death in athletes have been attributed to LVNC. We expect as imaging modalities continue to improve and as preparticipation screening becomes more prevalent, scenarios such as ours will become increasingly common. Patients with hypertrabeculation but preserved left ventricular function may represent a low-risk group. Close follow-up along with longitudinal registry studies will continue to be important to establishing risk in patients such as ours.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: February 25, 2014.

Corresponding Author: David C. Peritz, MD, Department of Medicine/Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 160 Dental Circle, Campus Box 7075, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (

Published Online: June 9, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1066.

Author Contributions: Drs Peritz and Chung had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Peritz, Vaughn, Chung.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Vaughn, Ciocca, Chung.

Drafting of the manuscript: Peritz, Vaughn, Chung.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Vaughn, Ciocca, Chung.

Study supervision: Ciocca, Chung.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Previous Presentation: This study was presented as an abstract in poster form at the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting; April 17-21, 2013; San Diego, California.

Bellet  S, Gouley  BA.  Congenital heart disease with multiple cardiac anomalies: report of a case showing aortic atresia, fibrous scar in myocardium and embryonal sinusoidal remains. Am J Med Sci. 1932;183:458-465.Article
Chin  TK, Perloff  JK, Williams  RG, Jue  K, Mohrmann  R.  Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium: a study of eight cases. Circulation. 1990;82(2):507-513.
Paterick  TE, Tajik  AJ.  Left ventricular noncompaction: a diagnostically challenging cardiomyopathy. Circ J. 2012;76(7):1556-1562.
Pignatelli  RH, McMahon  CJ, Dreyer  WJ,  et al.  Clinical characterization of left ventricular noncompaction in children: a relatively common form of cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2003;108(21):2672-2678.
Lofiego  C, Biagini  E, Pasquale  F,  et al.  Wide spectrum of presentation and variable outcomes of isolated left ventricular non-compaction. Heart. 2007;93(1):65-71.
Maron  B, Ackerman  MJ, Nishimura  RA,  et al.  Task Force 4: HCM and other cardiomyopathies, mitral valve prolapse, myocarditis, and Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(8):1340-1345.
Jenni  R, Oechslin  E, Schneider  J, Attenhofer Jost  C, Kaufmann  PA.  Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2001;86(6):666-671.
Petersen  SE, Selvanayagam  JB, Wiesmann  F,  et al.  Left ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(1):101-105.
Grothoff  M, Pachowsky  M, Hoffmann  J,  et al.  Value of cardiovascular MR in diagnosing left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy and in discriminating between other cardiomyopathies. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(12):2699-2709.
Gati  S, Chandra  N, Bennett  RL,  et al.  Increased left ventricular trabeculation in highly trained athletes: do we need more stringent criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction in athletes? Heart. 2013;99(6):401-408.
Captur  G, Muthurangu  V, Cook  C,  et al.  Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using fractal analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:36.
Gati  S, Papadakis  M, Van Niekerk  N, Reed  M, Yeghen  T, Sharma  S.  Increased left ventricular trabeculation in individuals with sickle cell anaemia: physiology or pathology? Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1658-1660.
Ichida  F, Hamamichi  Y, Miyawaki  T,  et al.  Clinical features of isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium: long-term clinical course, hemodynamic properties, and genetic background. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(1):233-240.
Burke  A, Mont  E, Kutys  R, Virmani  R.  Left ventricular noncompaction: a pathological study of 14 cases. Hum Pathol. 2005;36(4):403-411.