[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure.
Proportion of Eligible Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) at Veterans Health Administration (VA) Facilities With and Without CR Programs
Proportion of Eligible Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) at Veterans Health Administration (VA) Facilities With and Without CR Programs

The participants were hospitalized October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2011. All differences were significant at P < .001. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; IHD, ischemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table.  
Factors Associated With Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among 88 826 Veterans With Ischemic Heart Diseasea
Factors Associated With Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among 88 826 Veterans With Ischemic Heart Diseasea
1.
Drozda  J  Jr, Messer  JV, Spertus  J,  et al; American Academy of Family Physicians; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; American College of Emergency Physicians; American College of Radiology; American Nurses Association; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Society of Hospital Medicine; Society of Thoracic Surgeons.  ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with coronary artery disease and hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association–Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(3):316-336.
PubMedArticle
2.
Thomas  RJ, King  M, Lui  K, Oldridge  N, Piña  IL, Spertus  J; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Performance Measures Writing Committee.  AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. Circulation. 2007;116(14):1611-1642.
PubMedArticle
3.
Heran  BS, Chen  JM, Ebrahim  S,  et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD001800. doi:10.1002/14651858.
PubMed
4.
Suaya  JA, Shepard  DS, Normand  SL, Ades  PA, Prottas  J, Stason  WB.  Use of cardiac rehabilitation by Medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1653-1662.
PubMedArticle
5.
Balady  GJ, Ades  PA, Bittner  VA,  et al; American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.  Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124(25):2951-2960.
PubMedArticle
Research Letter
October 2014

Cardiac Rehabilitation Use Among Veterans With Ischemic Heart Disease

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
  • 2New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Northwest Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington
  • 4Division of Cardiology, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
  • 5Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver
  • 6Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 7Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 8Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 9Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • 10Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(10):1687-1689. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3441

Referral to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is 1 of 9 performance measures for secondary prevention after hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and/or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).1,2 Although CR programs significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD),3 they are vastly underused among US Medicare beneficiaries.4 The use of CR programs in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has not been described. Therefore, we sought to determine (1) the proportion of eligible veterans with IHD who participate in CR, (2) whether the presence of an on-site CR program is associated with greater participation, and (3) the characteristics of the CR participants.

Methods

National VA inpatient files were used to identify all patients discharged from VA facilities with a diagnosis of MI, PCI, and/or CABG during fiscal years 2007 to 2011 (eMethods in Supplement 1). The number of patients who participated in VA CR programs during the 12 months following hospitalization was determined from VA outpatient files. The number of eligible patients who participated in non-VA CR programs was determined from non-VA care files and from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Institutional review board approval was obtained from the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco.

Results

Between October 1, 2006, and September 30, 2011, a total of 88 826 unique patients were hospitalized for MI, PCI, or CABG at 124 VA facilities. Of these, 9123 patients (10.3%) participated in 1 or more sessions of outpatient CR during the 12 months after hospitalization (eTable 1 in Supplement 1). Overall, there was no significant difference in participation by sex: 10.3% of men (8976 of 87 359) and 10.0% of women (143 of 1426) received CR (P = .76), and 8.0% of whites (2093 of 26 150) and 8.3% of nonwhites (587 of 7068) received CR (P = .41). Overall, 10.4% of whites (7126 of 68 259) and 9.8% of nonwhites (1610 of 16 397) received any CR (P = .02). Whites were more likely than nonwhites to attend non-VA CR programs (5.7% vs 2.8%; P < .001) and less likely than nonwhites to attend on-site VA CR programs (4.9% vs 7.2%; P < .001).

From fiscal years 2007 to 2011, participation rates remained stable between 8.5% and 8.7% for all years. There was a significant interaction between the presence of an on-site CR program and the distance to the closest VA medical center (P < .001 for interaction). Therefore, we stratified analyses by the presence (35 VA facilities) or absence (89 VA facilities) of an on-site CR program (eTable 2 and eTable 3 in Supplement 1).

Overall, patients were more likely to participate in CR if they had been hospitalized at a VA facility with vs a facility without an on-site CR program (15.5% vs 7.5%; P < .001). Facilities with vs those without on-site CR programs had higher rates of participation (Figure). In multivariable models, the characteristics associated with greater participation were younger age, marriage, higher body mass index, living closer to a VA facility, hyperlipidemia, absence of stroke, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic lung disease, and hospitalization for CABG (vs PCI or MI) (Table). After controlling for these variables, the presence of an on-site CR program was associated with a greater odds of attending a CR program (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.89-2.10; P < .001).

Discussion

In this study of 88 826 veterans hospitalized for MI, PCI, or CABG, 10.3% of eligible patients participated in 1 or more sessions of outpatient CR. Both the presence of an on-site CR program and patient proximity to a VA facility were associated with greater participation in CR. However, participation was low regardless of the presence (15.5%) or absence (7.5%) of an on-site program. These findings suggest that new patient-centered delivery strategies must be developed to solve the seemingly intractable challenge of CR underuse.5

Back to top
Article Information

Retraction and Replacement: This article was retracted and replaced on October 10, 2016, for errors in data in the text, tables, and figure (see Supplement 2 for a copy of the replacement article with corrections highlighted and a copy of the retracted article with errors highlighted).

Corresponding Author: David W. Schopfer, MD, MAS, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St (111A1), San Francisco, CA 94121 (david.schopfer@gmail.com).

Published Online: August 18, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3441

Author Contributions: Drs Schopfer and Whooley had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Schopfer, Takemoto, Allsup, Helfrich, Forman, Whooley.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Schopfer, Takemoto, Ho, Whooley.

Drafting of the manuscript: Schopfer, Takemoto.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Schopfer, Takemoto, Whooley.

Obtained funding: Schopfer, Forman, Whooley.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Allsup, Helfrich.

Study supervision: Forman, Whooley.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Whooley has received research funding from Janssen Healthcare Innovations.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant QUERI RRP 12-232 from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) Office of Health Services Research and Development. Dr Schopfer was supported by the VA Quality Scholars Fellowship Program.

Role of the Sponsor: The VA had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: John Rumsfeld, MD, PhD, administered the VA Survey of Cardiovascular Specialty Care Services and provided critical comments on the manuscript. No financial reimbursement was provided.

References
1.
Drozda  J  Jr, Messer  JV, Spertus  J,  et al; American Academy of Family Physicians; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; American College of Emergency Physicians; American College of Radiology; American Nurses Association; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Society of Hospital Medicine; Society of Thoracic Surgeons.  ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with coronary artery disease and hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association–Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(3):316-336.
PubMedArticle
2.
Thomas  RJ, King  M, Lui  K, Oldridge  N, Piña  IL, Spertus  J; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Performance Measures Writing Committee.  AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. Circulation. 2007;116(14):1611-1642.
PubMedArticle
3.
Heran  BS, Chen  JM, Ebrahim  S,  et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD001800. doi:10.1002/14651858.
PubMed
4.
Suaya  JA, Shepard  DS, Normand  SL, Ades  PA, Prottas  J, Stason  WB.  Use of cardiac rehabilitation by Medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1653-1662.
PubMedArticle
5.
Balady  GJ, Ades  PA, Bittner  VA,  et al; American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.  Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124(25):2951-2960.
PubMedArticle
×