[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 167
Citations 0
October 2016

Error in Reported Odds Ratios

JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1579. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5103

In the Research Letter “Differences in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Among Urologists and Primary Care Physicians Following the 2012 USPSTF Recommendations,”1 published in the April 2016 issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, there were statistical errors reported in the original article (odds ratios and associated confidence intervals and P values). These errors affected the numbers reported in the text and figure but did not affect the primary conclusions of the study. The article was corrected online.

Zavaski  ME, Meyer  CP, Sammon  JD,  et al.  Differences in prostate-specific antigen testing among urologists and primary care physicians following the 2012 USPSTF recommendations. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):546-547. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7901.PubMedArticle