[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.0.26. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1.
Process of study selection from electronic search. VTE indicates venous thromboembolism.

Process of study selection from electronic search. VTE indicates venous thromboembolism.

Figure 2.
Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and heterozygous factor V 1691A (Leiden) (FVL) vs no FVL in reviewed studies. Except where otherwise indicated, data are reported as number of patients with VTE recurrence/number of patients with a first VTE. In the test for heterogeneity, χ29 = 15.35, P = .08; I2 = 41.4%. For overall effect, z = 3.14 (P = .002). In the graphic representation, squares represent the effect size; extended lines, 95% confidence interval (CI); and diamond, total effect size. The arrow on the standard error (SE) line of the Ridker et al study indicates that the upper SE extends beyond the upper range of the illustrated scale by an unspecified amount. OR indicates odds ratio.

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and heterozygous factor V 1691A (Leiden) (FVL) vs no FVL in reviewed studies. Except where otherwise indicated, data are reported as number of patients with VTE recurrence/number of patients with a first VTE. In the test for heterogeneity, χ29 = 15.35, P = .08; I2 = 41.4%. For overall effect, z = 3.14 (P = .002). In the graphic representation, squares represent the effect size; extended lines, 95% confidence interval (CI); and diamond, total effect size. The arrow on the standard error (SE) line of the Ridker et al9 study indicates that the upper SE extends beyond the upper range of the illustrated scale by an unspecified amount. OR indicates odds ratio.

Figure 3.
Funnel plot of published studies on factor V Leiden carriage vs noncarriage and recurrent venous thromboembolism. OR indicates odds ratio.

Funnel plot of published studies on factor V Leiden carriage vs noncarriage and recurrent venous thromboembolism. OR indicates odds ratio.

Figure 4.
Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and heterozygous prothrombin G20210A vs no G20210A in reviewed studies. Except where otherwise indicated, data are reported as number of patients with VTE recurrence/number of patients with a first VTE. In the test for heterogeneity, χ28 = 11.14, P = .19; I2 = 28.2%. For overall effect, z = 3.55 (P<.001). In the graphic representation, squares represent the effect size; extended lines, confidence interval (CI); and diamond, total effect size. The arrow on the standard error (SE) line of the Miles et al study indicates that the upper SE extends beyond the upper range of the illustrated scale by an unspecified amount. OR indicates odds ratio.

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and heterozygous prothrombin G20210A vs no G20210A in reviewed studies. Except where otherwise indicated, data are reported as number of patients with VTE recurrence/number of patients with a first VTE. In the test for heterogeneity, χ28 = 11.14, P = .19; I2 = 28.2%. For overall effect, z = 3.55 (P<.001). In the graphic representation, squares represent the effect size; extended lines, confidence interval (CI); and diamond, total effect size. The arrow on the standard error (SE) line of the Miles et al19 study indicates that the upper SE extends beyond the upper range of the illustrated scale by an unspecified amount. OR indicates odds ratio.

Figure 5.
Funnel plot of published studies on prothrombin G20210A carriage and recurrent venous thromboembolism. OR indicates odds ratio.

Funnel plot of published studies on prothrombin G20210A carriage and recurrent venous thromboembolism. OR indicates odds ratio.

Table 1. 
Studies Examining FVL Carriage and Risk of Recurrent VTE*
Studies Examining FVL Carriage and Risk of Recurrent VTE*
Table 2. 
Sensitivity Analyses
Sensitivity Analyses
Table 3. 
Studies Examining Prothrombin G20210A Carriage and Risk of Recurrent VTE*
Studies Examining Prothrombin G20210A Carriage and Risk of Recurrent VTE*
1.
Prandoni  PLensing  AWCogo  A  et al.  The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996;1251- 7
PubMedArticle
2.
Eichinger  SWeltermann  AMinar  E  et al.  Symptomatic pulmonary embolism and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2004;16492- 96
PubMedArticle
3.
Büller  HRAgnelli  GHull  RDHyers  TMPrins  MHRaskob  GE Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126 ((3)(suppl)) 401S- 428S
PubMedArticle
4.
Kearon  C Long-term management of patients after venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004;110 ((suppl 1)) I10- I18
PubMedArticle
5.
Ost  DTepper  JMihara  HLander  OHeinzer  RFein  A Duration of anticoagulation following venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2005;294706- 715
PubMedArticle
6.
Rees  DCCox  MClegg  JB World distribution of factor V Leiden. Lancet 1995;3461133- 1134
PubMedArticle
7.
Rosendaal  FRDoggen  CJZivelin  A  et al.  Geographic distribution of the 20210 G to A prothrombin variant. Thromb Haemost 1998;79706- 708
PubMed
8.
De Stefano  VRossi  EPaciaroni  KLeone  G Screening for inherited thrombophilia: indications and therapeutic implications. Haematologica 2002;871095- 1108
PubMed
9.
Ridker  PMMiletich  JPStampfer  MJGoldhaber  SZLindpaintner  KHennekens  CH Factor V Leiden and risks of recurrent idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Circulation 1995;922800- 2802
PubMedArticle
10.
Rintelen  CPabinger  IKnobl  PLechner  KMannhalter  C Probability of recurrence of thrombosis in patients with and without factor V Leiden. Thromb Haemost 1996;75229- 232
PubMed
11.
Eichinger  SPabinger  IStumpflen  A  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with and without factor V Leiden. Thromb Haemost 1997;77624- 628
PubMed
12.
Simioni  PPrandoni  PLensing  AW  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with an Arg506→Gln mutation in the gene for factor V (factor V Leiden). N Engl J Med 1997;336399- 403
PubMedArticle
13.
De Stefano  VMartinelli  IMannucci  PM  et al.  The risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis among heterozygous carriers of both factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation. N Engl J Med 1999;341801- 806
PubMedArticle
14.
Eichinger  SMinar  EHirschl  M  et al.  The risk of early recurrent venous thromboembolism after oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with the G20210A transition in the prothrombin gene. Thromb Haemost 1999;8114- 17
PubMed
15.
Lindmarker  PSchulman  SSten-Linder  M  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers and non-carriers of the G1691A allele in the coagulation factor V gene and the G20210A allele in the prothrombin gene: duration of anticoagulation. Thromb Haemost 1999;81684- 689
PubMed
16.
Margaglione  MD'Andrea  GColaizzo  D  et al.  Coexistence of factor V Leiden and factor II A20210 mutations and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1999;821583- 1587
PubMed
17.
Simioni  PPrandoni  PLensing  AW  et al.  Risk for subsequent venous thromboembolic complications in carriers of the prothrombin or the factor V gene mutation with a first episode of deep-vein thrombosis. Blood 2000;963329- 3333
PubMed
18.
De Stefano  VMartinelli  IMannucci  PM  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation. Br J Haematol 2001;113630- 635
PubMedArticle
19.
Miles  JSMiletich  JPGoldhaber  SZHennekens  CHRidker  PM G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37215- 218
PubMedArticle
20.
Christiansen  SCCannegieter  SCKoster  TVandenbroucke  JPRosendaal  FR Thrombophilia, clinical factors, and recurrent venous thrombotic events. JAMA 2005;2932352- 2361
PubMedArticle
21.
Machin  SJ Pros and cons of thrombophilia testing: cons. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1412- 413
PubMedArticle
22.
Martinelli  I Pros and cons of thrombophilia testing: pros. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1410- 411
PubMedArticle
23.
Mantel  NHaenszel  W Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22719- 748
PubMed
24.
Higgins  JPThompson  SGDeeks  JJAltman  DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327557- 560
PubMedArticle
25.
Deeks  JJedHiggins  JPTedAltman  DGed Analysing and presenting results. Alderson  PGreen  SHiggins  JedsCochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 [updated November 2004]; Section 8. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm. Accessed March 23, 2005
26.
Ridker  PM Factor V Leiden and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1996;76815- 816
PubMed
27.
Schattner  AKasher  IBerrebi  A Causes and outcome of deep-vein thrombosis in otherwise-healthy patients under 50 years. QJM 1997;90283- 287
PubMedArticle
28.
Baglin  CBrown  KLuddington  RBaglin  TEast Anglian Thrombophilia Study Group, Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with the factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) mutation: effect of warfarin and prediction by precipitating factors. Br J Haematol 1998;100764- 768
PubMedArticle
29.
Kearon  CGent  MHirsh  J  et al.  A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1999;340901- 907
PubMedArticle
30.
Piemontino  UGuiotto  GRugiada  FCirillo  FCerbone  AM Abnormally high frequency of inherited pro-thrombotic conditions in subjects with recurrence of venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1999;821359- 1360
PubMed
31.
Eichinger  SWeltermann  AMannhalter  C  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and a first spontaneous venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2002;1622357- 2360
PubMedArticle
32.
Keijzer  MBden Heijer  MBlom  HJ  et al.  Interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia, mutated methylenetetrahydrofolatereductase (MTHFR) and inherited thrombophilic factors in recurrent venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2002;88723- 728
PubMed
33.
Meinardi  JRMiddeldorp  Sde Kam  PJ  et al.  The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden is related to concomitant thrombophilic disorders. Br J Haematol 2002;116625- 631
PubMedArticle
34.
Baglin  TLuddington  RBrown  KBaglin  C Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in relation to clinical and thrombophilic risk factors: prospective cohort study. Lancet 2003;362523- 526
PubMedArticle
35.
Marcucci  RLiotta  AACellai  AP  et al.  Increased plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) and the risk of idiopathic and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 2003;115601- 605
PubMedArticle
36.
Palareti  GLegnani  CCosmi  B  et al.  Predictive value of D-dimer test for recurrent venous thromboembolism after anticoagulation withdrawal in subjects with a previous idiopathic event and in carriers of congenital thrombophilia. Circulation 2003;108313- 318
PubMedArticle
37.
Procare Group, Is recurrent venous thromboembolism more frequent in homozygous patients for the factor V Leiden mutation than in heterozygous patients? Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2003;14523- 529
PubMedArticle
38.
Ridker  PMGoldhaber  SZDanielson  E  et al.  Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003;3481425- 1434
PubMedArticle
39.
Spiezia  LBernardi  ETormene  DSimioni  PGirolami  APrandoni  P Recurrent thromboembolism in fertile women with venous thrombosis: incidence and risk factors. Thromb Haemost 2003;90964- 966
PubMed
40.
Kyrle  PAMinar  EBialonczyk  CHirschl  MWeltermann  AEichinger  S The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in men and women. N Engl J Med 2004;3502558- 2563
PubMedArticle
41.
Kyrle  PAEichinger  S The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: the Austrian Study on Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2003;115471- 474
PubMedArticle
42.
Schulman  SRhedin  ASLindmarker  P  et al. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group, A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1995;3321661- 1665
PubMedArticle
43.
 Findings from the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. N Engl J Med 1988;318262- 264
PubMedArticle
44.
Schulman  SGranqvist  SHolmström  M  et al.  The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997;336393- 398
PubMedArticle
45.
Marchetti  MPistorio  ABarosi  G Extended anticoagulation for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden–cost-effectiveness analysis. Thromb Haemost 2000;84752- 757
PubMed
46.
Vink  RKraaijenhagen  RALevi  MBüller  HR Individualized duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis based on a decision model. J Thromb Haemost 2003;12523- 2530
PubMedArticle
Review Article
April 10, 2006

Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Common ThrombophiliaA Systematic Review

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital and Centre for Clinical Research Excellence (Dr Ho), Stroke Unit, Royal Perth Hospital and School of Medicine and Pharmacology (Dr Hankey), University of Western Australia, Perth; Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London, England (Dr Quinlan); and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Eikelboom).

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(7):729-736. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.7.729
Abstract

The 2 most common genetic polymorphisms that predispose to a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A. However, the effect of these polymorphisms on the risk of recurrent VTE is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain best estimates of the relative risk of recurrent VTE associated with these genetic polymorphisms. Electronic and manual searches were used to identify cohort studies of patients with a first episode of VTE that reported the incidence of objectively confirmed recurrence following discontinuation of anticoagulation among those with or without heterozygous FVL or prothrombin G20210A polymorphism. Thirteen reports fulfilled our criteria for inclusion. Pooled results from 10 studies involving 3104 patients with first-ever VTE revealed that FVL was present in 21.4% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-23%) and associated with an increased odds of recurrent VTE of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.14-1.75; P = .08 for heterogeneity). Pooled results from 9 studies involving 2903 patients with first-ever VTE revealed that prothrombin G20210A was present in 9.7% of patients (95% CI, 9%-11%) and associated with an increased odds of recurrent VTE of 1.72 (95% CI, 1.27-2.31; P = .19). The estimated population-attributable risk of recurrence for FVL was 9.0% (95% CI, 4.5%-13.2%) and for prothrombin G20210A was 6.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-9.9%). Heterozygous FVL and prothrombin G20210A are each associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent VTE after a first event, but the magnitude of the increase in risk is modest and by itself is unlikely to merit extended-duration anticoagulation. These data call into question the cost-effectiveness of routine testing for these common inherited thrombophilic polymorphisms among patients with a first episode of VTE.

Patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk of recurrent thrombosis during long-term follow-up. After a first-ever deep venous thrombosis (DVT), the cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE is about 15% after 2 years, 25% after 5 years, and 30% after 8 years.1 In another study, the likelihood of recurrent VTE was 7% and 19% at 2 years, respectively, for patients who experienced a first DVT without concomitant symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) and for those with a first symptomatic PE.2 Long-term warfarin anticoagulation reduces the risk of recurrence by 80% to 90% but is inconvenient, causes major or fatal bleeding in 1% to 3% of patients each year, and has never been shown to reduce mortality.35 The challenge for clinicians is to accurately predict the risk of recurrence and bleeding in individual patients following a first episode of VTE so that only those at highest risk of recurrence are targeted with long-term warfarin treatment while those at lower risk of recurrence or increased risk of bleeding can stop warfarin therapy.

Patients can be stratified according to their risk of recurrent VTE by considering the setting in which the initial event occurred. Those in whom VTE is provoked by a self-limited risk factor (eg, hospitalization or surgery) have a 1% to 4% incidence each year of recurrence when warfarin treatment is discontinued4 and are therefore unlikely to benefit from long-term warfarin therapy. In contrast, patients with unprovoked VTE have a 5% to 10% or higher annual incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism.4 The 2004 American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines suggest that these patients should be considered for indefinite warfarin therapy.3 However, even in this group, most patients do not experience recurrent VTE and would therefore be taking warfarin unnecessarily. This suggests that better approaches to risk stratification are required.

Attention has recently focused on the possible role of inherited thrombophilia to predict the risk of recurrent thrombosis. In the general white population, the 2 most common inherited thrombophilic disorders are factor V Leiden (FVL) (prevalence, 2%-7%)6 and prothrombin G20210A (prevalence, 2%-3%).7 Factor V Leiden increases the risk of a first episode of VTE by 3- to 7-fold, whereas prothrombin G20210A increases the risk by 2- to 3-fold.8 In white patients with a history of VTE, the prevalence of FVL is reported to be about 20%, and that of prothrombin G20210A about 7%.8 Yet it is unclear whether these polymorphisms also increase the risk of recurrent VTE, with conflicting reports published in the medical literature.920

Obtaining reliable estimates of the risk of recurrent VTE associated with heterozygosity for FVL or prothrombin G20210A is important for clinicians and patients because (1) at least 1 of these thrombophilic disorders affect approximately one quarter of unselected patients with VTE8; (2) genetic testing is readily available and is increasingly being requested by patients; (3) some experts already recommend extended (>6 months) or indefinite anticoagulation in affected patients after a first VTE3; and (4) testing for FVL or prothrombin G20210A potentially has important social, medicolegal, and economic implications.21,22

The aim of this meta-analysis was to obtain the most reliable estimates of the prevalence of heterozygous carriage of FVL or prothrombin G20210A among patients with first-ever VTE, and risk of recurrent VTE conferred by heterozygous carriage of FVL or prothrombin G20210A compared with noncarriers.

METHODS

A protocol was prospectively developed, detailing the specific objectives, criteria for study selection, approach to assessing study quality, outcomes, and statistical methods.

STUDY IDENTIFICATION

We searched the literature from January 1, 1993, to June 30, 2005, using the MEDLINE database to identify studies that examined the association between FVL or prothrombin G20210A and recurrent VTE using the following terms singly and in combination: pulmonary embolism, venous thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, recurrence, recurrent, factor V Leiden, activated protein C resistance, prothrombin G20210A, and prothrombin gene mutation. The search strategy had no language restrictions.

We manually searched reference lists of journal articles to locate additional studies. We assessed the relevance of studies by using a hierarchical approach based on title, abstract, and the full manuscript.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. To be included, studies had to meet the following criteria: (1) cohort design, in which clinical outcomes in carriers of FVL and of prothrombin G20210A were compared with outcomes in noncarriers; (2) include patients with a first episode of VTE, including DVT of the lower limbs and/or PE; (3) the index event had to be treated with effective anticoagulation (eg, unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin therapy) for at least 3 months; (4) the duration of follow-up had to be at least 6 months after discontinuation of anticoagulation; and (5) index and recurrent thrombotic events had to be objectively confirmed.

Studies were excluded if (1) the duration of anticoagulation was not certain; (2) the report concerned family studies, pediatric or obstetric patients, or venous thrombosis in unusual sites only (eg, mesenteric, renal, upper limbs, or cerebral sinuses); and (3) the case involved duplicate reports, in which case only the report containing the most complete data was included.

STUDY QUALITY

Study quality was assessed according to the following criteria: (1) design (prospective cohort studies were considered higher quality than retrospective cohort studies); (2) patients (inception cohort studies were considered higher quality than noninception cohorts); and (3) follow-up (studies with at least 90% complete follow-up were considered higher quality than studies in which follow-up was less than 90% complete).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted the following data: (1) study characteristics (year, design, study center); (2) patients (number, eligibility); (3) index event (DVT or PE); (4) treatment duration; (5) duration of follow-up; and (6) study quality.

We excluded, where relevant data were available, those patients whose index (first) VTE occurred in the setting of cancer because this is an independent predictor of recurrence that can potentially modify the nature of the association between FVL or prothrombin G20210A and recurrent VTE. We contacted authors of potentially suitable studies for missing data.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We pooled results from the individual studies using Review Manager (RevMan), version 4.2 for Windows (The Cochrane Collaboration 2002, Oxford, England). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method)23 and compared these findings with results obtained using a random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method). We assessed heterogeneity among studies using the Cochran Q and the I2 statistic: P<.10 was considered to denote statistically significant heterogeneity, and where I2 was greater than 50%, heterogeneity was considered substantial.24,25 We removed 1 study at a time to assess the source of the heterogeneity (where present).

We also calculated the unadjusted risk of recurrent VTE attributable to carriage of either polymorphism in these pooled cohorts.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSES

We performed sensitivity analyses by examining the results separately in prospective and retrospective studies, by year of study commencement (studies commenced before and after the median year of commencement of all the studies), enrollment of patients with PE at initial presentation, the inclusion of patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome, and by number of years of follow-up.

PUBLICATION BIAS

We explored the potential for publication bias using funnel plots of effect size vs standard error.

RESULTS
STUDY SELECTION

The process of study selection is presented in Figure 1. Our search yielded 241 reports (235 Medline results and 6 found by manual search), of which 213 were excluded on the basis of title/abstract. Of the remaining 28 articles,2,919,2640 15 were excluded for the following reasons: (1) not a cohort study28,30,32,33; (2) included patients with recurrent VTE, and data for those with a first event could not be separately obtained16,29,33,38; (3) duration of anticoagulation was unknown, and additional information could not be obtained from the author10; (4) 1 or more updated reports were available11,12,26; and (5) the report was a substudy2,39,40 or letter/commentary26 where the main study results were reported elsewhere.

STUDY QUALITY

Four of the studies on the association between FVL and risk of VTE recurrence were prospective inception cohorts with at least 90% complete follow-up and were therefore considered of high quality.17,20,31,34 Similarly, 4 studies on prothrombin G20210A carriage were considered of high quality.14,17,20,34

FACTOR V LEIDEN

Ten studies examining the association between FVL and risk of recurrent VTE fulfilled our inclusion criteria (Table 1). The 4 high-quality studies yielded conflicting results concerning the risk conferred by carriage of this polymorphism.17,20,31,34 The estimates of risk were between 0.9 to 2.4; in 3 studies, this did not achieve statistical significance,20,31,34 while in the fourth,17 there was a statistically significant increase in odds of recurrence compared with noncarriers of FVL (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.1).

The 10 studies included a total of 3104 patients with first-ever VTE, 663 (21.4%; 95% CI, 19.9%-22.8%) of whom were heterozygous carriers of FVL. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1.6 to 8.3 years. Among those with recurrent VTE during follow-up, the prevalence of FVL was 28.4%, whereas the polymorphism was present in 19.9% of those with no recurrent events.

Using a fixed-effects model, the OR of recurrence conferred by heterozygous carriage of FVL after a first VTE was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.14-1.75) (Figure 2). Although there was significant statistical heterogeneity (P = .08, I2 = 41.4%), the random effects model yielded a similar estimate of increased risk (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.06).

Statistical heterogeneity was no longer evident when the study by Simioni et al17 was removed from the analysis (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03-1.63; P = .37 for heterogeneity; I2 = 8.2%). This study was conducted in Padua, Italy, and involved patients with DVT who were referred to a specialist thrombosis center (Table 1). Patients with PE were not eligible for inclusion in this study. Two other studies had similar exclusion criteria but, unlike the study by Simioni et al,17 were not a major source of heterogeneity.13,27 The age of study participants, proportion of men, and prevalence of FVL in the study by Simioni et al17 were similar to many of the other studies included in our meta-analysis. We were unable to further explore referral bias or differential use of cointerventions as potential sources of heterogeneity because this information was not provided.

Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar odds of VTE recurrence when studies were analyzed according to their design (prospective vs retrospective), follow-up duration, whether patients with PE or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome were included, and whether studies were commenced prior to or after the median year of commencement of all the studies (Table 2). A funnel plot of effect size vs standard error was broadly symmetrical (Figure 3), which is consistent with the conclusion that there was no major publication bias. Among patients with a first VTE, the estimated attributable risk of recurrence conferred by heterozygous carriage of FVL was 9.0% (95% CI, 4.5%-13.2%).

PROTHROMBIN G20210A

Nine studies examining the association between prothrombin G20210A and risk of recurrent VTE fulfilled our inclusion criteria (Table 3). Of the 4 high-quality studies, only 1 found a statistically significant increase in risk of recurrence associated with heterozygous carriage of the G20210A polymorphism (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7).17

The 9 studies included a total of 2903 patients with first-ever VTE, 283 (9.7%; 95% CI, 8.7%-10.9%) of whom were carriers of the G20210A polymorphism. The follow-up duration ranged from 1.7 to 8.3 years. Prothrombin G20210A was present in 15.8% of those with recurrent VTE and in 8.6% of those with no recurrences.

The OR of recurrence after a first VTE conferred by heterozygous carriage of prothrombin G20210A was 1.72 (95% CI, 1.27-2.31) under the fixed-effects model, with no statistically significant heterogeneity (P = .19; I2 = 28.2%) (Figure 4). The random effects model yielded a similar estimate (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.23-2.65). The funnel plot of effect size vs standard error was broadly symmetrical (Figure 5), suggesting no marked publication bias.

Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar odds of VTE recurrence when studies were analyzed according to their design (prospective vs retrospective), follow-up duration, whether patients with PE or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome were included, and whether studies were commenced prior to or after the median year of commencement of all the studies (Table 2).

The estimated attributable risk of recurrence conferred by prothrombin G20210A was 6.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-9.9%) in this pooled cohort.

COMMENT

Our results indicate that the prevalence of heterozygous carriage of FVL and prothrombin G20210A was more common among patients with recurrent VTE (28.4% and 15.8%, respectively) than among those who had no recurrences (19.9% and 8.6%, respectively). Each polymorphism conferred a significant increase in odds of recurrent VTE: for heterozygous FVL by about 40% (14%-75%) and for heterozygous prothrombin G20210A by about 70% (27%-131%). However, the magnitude of these increases in risk of recurrence are much lower than the risk for first-ever VTE (3- to 7-fold for FVL and 2- to 3-fold for prothrombin G20210A).8 Consequently, the combined population attributable risk of recurrent VTE associated with FVL and prothrombin G20210A is modest (ie, at most, only up to 1 in 6 recurrent VTEs may be attributable to these mutations).

The strengths of our study are that we carefully searched the literature to identify all studies that examined the risk of recurrent VTE conferred by heterozygous carriage of FVL or prothrombin G20210A compared with noncarriage, thereby ensuring that our analyses provide the most reliable estimates to date of this risk. We restricted inclusion to cohort studies that included patients with a first objectively confirmed VTE because patients with multiple prior events may have a different natural history and may be more likely to be selected for inclusion in studies and investigated for recurrent VTE. Furthermore, those with multiple previous events are candidates for long-term preventive strategies regardless of their thrombophilia status.3,44 We also excluded cases of VTE known to be associated with active cancer. Because of the potential for underreporting of negative studies, we examined publication bias by means of funnel plots, and there does not appear to be any.

The potential weaknesses of our study are several. First, although we established predefined criteria for study selection, the quality of meta-analysis remains dependent on the quality of the included studies. Four of the 13 reports included in our meta-analysis were retrospective, and all studies were subject to selection or referral bias because patients with unprovoked VTE, a large thrombotic burden, or significant comorbidities are more likely to be referred to specialist centers, included in studies, and described in the literature. Second, the included studies were conducted over different time periods (1980s to 2002), and it is unclear how changing clinical practices and the introduction and uptake of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches might have influenced referral and treatment patterns. However, sensitivity analyses demonstrated broadly similar odds of VTE recurrence in the cases with FVL and prothrombin G20210A regardless of whether the study was started before or after the median year of commencement of all studies. Third, we could not obtain missing data from all of the studies despite contacting the authors. Finally, VTE is a multifactorial disorder, caused in part by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, many of which are still poorly defined and understood. Most of the studies included in our meta-analysis were undertaken in European centers, and it is unknown if our findings can be extrapolated to other communities with potentially different genetic and environmental risk factors for VTE.

FACTOR V LEIDEN

Our findings for the association between FVL and odds of recurrent VTE are consistent with those of 2 earlier meta-analyses.45,46 Marchetti et al45 reported an odds of recurrence of 1.36 (95% CI, 1.05-1.78) among patients with heterozygous FVL, based on the results of 6 studies involving 1721 patients, while Vink et al46 reported an odds of recurrence of 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.7) based on 7 studies involving 1984 patients. Our analyses for FVL are based on an additional 1120 patients and, unlike earlier reports, we did not include patients with recurrent VTE16 or studies in which a minimum duration of anticoagulant therapy could not be established.10

PROTHROMBIN G20210A

To our knowledge, the only previous meta-analysis examining the association between prothrombin G20210A and risk of recurrent VTE did not demonstrate a significant association (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0).46 This report included 5 studies and about 1922 patients and may have been underpowered to establish a significant association. Our study included an additional 981 patients and provides the most reliable evidence to date that prothrombin G20210A is a predictor of recurrent VTE.

The clinical implications of our study are that while patients with recurrent VTE are more likely to have heterozygous FVL or prothrombin G20210A than those without recurrence, the magnitude of increased risk is modest. Therefore, in the absence of other risk factors, the presence of either FVL or prothrombin G20210A alone is unlikely to merit extended-duration anticoagulation. This calls into question the cost-effectiveness of routine testing for these common inherited thrombophilic disorders in patients with a first episode of VTE. Decisions concerning the optimal duration of anticoagulation in an individual are likely to remain dependent primarily on assessment of the balance between the clinical determinants of recurrence, risk of major bleeding, and patient pREFERENCES.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: John W. Eikelboom, MBBS, MSc, FRACP, Thrombosis Service, McMaster University, HHS–General Division, 237 Barton St E, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8L 2X2 (eikelbj@mcmaster.ca).

Accepted for Publication: August 17, 2005.

Financial Disclosure: None.

Funding/Support: This research was supported in part by funds from a Tier II Canada Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine, Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Dr Eikelboom).

Acknowledgment: We thank the following authors for kindly providing us with additional data and/or clarification on their studies: Trevor Baglin, MD; Valerio De Stefano, MD; Per Lindmarker, MD; Rosella Marcucci, MD; Gualtiero Palareti, MD; Paolo Prandoni, MD; and Ami Schattner, MD.

References
1.
Prandoni  PLensing  AWCogo  A  et al.  The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996;1251- 7
PubMedArticle
2.
Eichinger  SWeltermann  AMinar  E  et al.  Symptomatic pulmonary embolism and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2004;16492- 96
PubMedArticle
3.
Büller  HRAgnelli  GHull  RDHyers  TMPrins  MHRaskob  GE Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126 ((3)(suppl)) 401S- 428S
PubMedArticle
4.
Kearon  C Long-term management of patients after venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004;110 ((suppl 1)) I10- I18
PubMedArticle
5.
Ost  DTepper  JMihara  HLander  OHeinzer  RFein  A Duration of anticoagulation following venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2005;294706- 715
PubMedArticle
6.
Rees  DCCox  MClegg  JB World distribution of factor V Leiden. Lancet 1995;3461133- 1134
PubMedArticle
7.
Rosendaal  FRDoggen  CJZivelin  A  et al.  Geographic distribution of the 20210 G to A prothrombin variant. Thromb Haemost 1998;79706- 708
PubMed
8.
De Stefano  VRossi  EPaciaroni  KLeone  G Screening for inherited thrombophilia: indications and therapeutic implications. Haematologica 2002;871095- 1108
PubMed
9.
Ridker  PMMiletich  JPStampfer  MJGoldhaber  SZLindpaintner  KHennekens  CH Factor V Leiden and risks of recurrent idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Circulation 1995;922800- 2802
PubMedArticle
10.
Rintelen  CPabinger  IKnobl  PLechner  KMannhalter  C Probability of recurrence of thrombosis in patients with and without factor V Leiden. Thromb Haemost 1996;75229- 232
PubMed
11.
Eichinger  SPabinger  IStumpflen  A  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with and without factor V Leiden. Thromb Haemost 1997;77624- 628
PubMed
12.
Simioni  PPrandoni  PLensing  AW  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with an Arg506→Gln mutation in the gene for factor V (factor V Leiden). N Engl J Med 1997;336399- 403
PubMedArticle
13.
De Stefano  VMartinelli  IMannucci  PM  et al.  The risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis among heterozygous carriers of both factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation. N Engl J Med 1999;341801- 806
PubMedArticle
14.
Eichinger  SMinar  EHirschl  M  et al.  The risk of early recurrent venous thromboembolism after oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with the G20210A transition in the prothrombin gene. Thromb Haemost 1999;8114- 17
PubMed
15.
Lindmarker  PSchulman  SSten-Linder  M  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers and non-carriers of the G1691A allele in the coagulation factor V gene and the G20210A allele in the prothrombin gene: duration of anticoagulation. Thromb Haemost 1999;81684- 689
PubMed
16.
Margaglione  MD'Andrea  GColaizzo  D  et al.  Coexistence of factor V Leiden and factor II A20210 mutations and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1999;821583- 1587
PubMed
17.
Simioni  PPrandoni  PLensing  AW  et al.  Risk for subsequent venous thromboembolic complications in carriers of the prothrombin or the factor V gene mutation with a first episode of deep-vein thrombosis. Blood 2000;963329- 3333
PubMed
18.
De Stefano  VMartinelli  IMannucci  PM  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation. Br J Haematol 2001;113630- 635
PubMedArticle
19.
Miles  JSMiletich  JPGoldhaber  SZHennekens  CHRidker  PM G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37215- 218
PubMedArticle
20.
Christiansen  SCCannegieter  SCKoster  TVandenbroucke  JPRosendaal  FR Thrombophilia, clinical factors, and recurrent venous thrombotic events. JAMA 2005;2932352- 2361
PubMedArticle
21.
Machin  SJ Pros and cons of thrombophilia testing: cons. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1412- 413
PubMedArticle
22.
Martinelli  I Pros and cons of thrombophilia testing: pros. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1410- 411
PubMedArticle
23.
Mantel  NHaenszel  W Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22719- 748
PubMed
24.
Higgins  JPThompson  SGDeeks  JJAltman  DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327557- 560
PubMedArticle
25.
Deeks  JJedHiggins  JPTedAltman  DGed Analysing and presenting results. Alderson  PGreen  SHiggins  JedsCochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 [updated November 2004]; Section 8. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm. Accessed March 23, 2005
26.
Ridker  PM Factor V Leiden and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1996;76815- 816
PubMed
27.
Schattner  AKasher  IBerrebi  A Causes and outcome of deep-vein thrombosis in otherwise-healthy patients under 50 years. QJM 1997;90283- 287
PubMedArticle
28.
Baglin  CBrown  KLuddington  RBaglin  TEast Anglian Thrombophilia Study Group, Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with the factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) mutation: effect of warfarin and prediction by precipitating factors. Br J Haematol 1998;100764- 768
PubMedArticle
29.
Kearon  CGent  MHirsh  J  et al.  A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1999;340901- 907
PubMedArticle
30.
Piemontino  UGuiotto  GRugiada  FCirillo  FCerbone  AM Abnormally high frequency of inherited pro-thrombotic conditions in subjects with recurrence of venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1999;821359- 1360
PubMed
31.
Eichinger  SWeltermann  AMannhalter  C  et al.  The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and a first spontaneous venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2002;1622357- 2360
PubMedArticle
32.
Keijzer  MBden Heijer  MBlom  HJ  et al.  Interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia, mutated methylenetetrahydrofolatereductase (MTHFR) and inherited thrombophilic factors in recurrent venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2002;88723- 728
PubMed
33.
Meinardi  JRMiddeldorp  Sde Kam  PJ  et al.  The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden is related to concomitant thrombophilic disorders. Br J Haematol 2002;116625- 631
PubMedArticle
34.
Baglin  TLuddington  RBrown  KBaglin  C Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in relation to clinical and thrombophilic risk factors: prospective cohort study. Lancet 2003;362523- 526
PubMedArticle
35.
Marcucci  RLiotta  AACellai  AP  et al.  Increased plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) and the risk of idiopathic and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 2003;115601- 605
PubMedArticle
36.
Palareti  GLegnani  CCosmi  B  et al.  Predictive value of D-dimer test for recurrent venous thromboembolism after anticoagulation withdrawal in subjects with a previous idiopathic event and in carriers of congenital thrombophilia. Circulation 2003;108313- 318
PubMedArticle
37.
Procare Group, Is recurrent venous thromboembolism more frequent in homozygous patients for the factor V Leiden mutation than in heterozygous patients? Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2003;14523- 529
PubMedArticle
38.
Ridker  PMGoldhaber  SZDanielson  E  et al.  Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003;3481425- 1434
PubMedArticle
39.
Spiezia  LBernardi  ETormene  DSimioni  PGirolami  APrandoni  P Recurrent thromboembolism in fertile women with venous thrombosis: incidence and risk factors. Thromb Haemost 2003;90964- 966
PubMed
40.
Kyrle  PAMinar  EBialonczyk  CHirschl  MWeltermann  AEichinger  S The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in men and women. N Engl J Med 2004;3502558- 2563
PubMedArticle
41.
Kyrle  PAEichinger  S The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: the Austrian Study on Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2003;115471- 474
PubMedArticle
42.
Schulman  SRhedin  ASLindmarker  P  et al. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group, A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1995;3321661- 1665
PubMedArticle
43.
 Findings from the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. N Engl J Med 1988;318262- 264
PubMedArticle
44.
Schulman  SGranqvist  SHolmström  M  et al.  The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997;336393- 398
PubMedArticle
45.
Marchetti  MPistorio  ABarosi  G Extended anticoagulation for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden–cost-effectiveness analysis. Thromb Haemost 2000;84752- 757
PubMed
46.
Vink  RKraaijenhagen  RALevi  MBüller  HR Individualized duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis based on a decision model. J Thromb Haemost 2003;12523- 2530
PubMedArticle
×