[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.172.174. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Review
April 2015

Nonmydriatic Ocular Fundus Photography in Neurologic Emergencies

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 2Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 3Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(4):455-459. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4053
Abstract

Importance  The ocular fundus examination is infrequently and poorly performed in clinical settings, placing patients at risk for missed and delayed diagnosis of vision- and life-threatening neurologic disease.

Objectives  To review the importance of ocular fundus examination, the limitations of direct ophthalmoscopy, and the relative merits of nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography in emergency neurologic diagnosis.

Evidence Review  PubMed queries were reviewed for articles of relevance to this review. Queries included relevant combinations of the search terms ophthalmoscopy, nonmydriatic, neurology, and emergency, including variant spellings and endings.

Findings  Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography is more sensitive than direct ophthalmoscopy in several settings. It can be feasibly performed in emergency departments and has substantial promise in improving neurologic diagnosis, particularly headache and cerebrovascular disease.

Conclusions and Relevance  Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography has notable advantages over direct ophthalmoscopy that likely outweigh its associated costs. More widespread deployment and integration into neurologic practice is expected to improve diagnosis and patient outcomes.

×