[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.74.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1997

Assisted Suicide-Reply

Author Affiliations

London, Ontario

Arch Neurol. 1997;54(6):674. doi:10.1001/archneur.1997.00550180005002

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In reply  Dr Kokmen's letter highlights the passionate intensity that euthanasia engenders. His novel suggestion that patients should petition the courts would bring to bear all the magesty, precedents, and safeguards of the law. On the other hand, unless expedited methods are put into place, the protracted nature of judicial deliberations risks inflicting the very slow death that the patients seek to avoid.Patients who gain timely sanctions from the courts for their decision to attain ultimate relief may be able to access from the judiciary more gentle methods of departure than those advocated by Dr Kokmen.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×