[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.114.118. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Observation
August 2000

A Patient With 2 Different Repeat Expansion Mutations

Author Affiliations

From the Institute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular Haematology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, England (Dr Nokelainen); the Rinnekoti Foundation, Espoo (Drs Heiskala and Kaski), the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, and the Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki (Dr Lehesjoki), Finland.

Arch Neurol. 2000;57(8):1199-1203. doi:10.1001/archneur.57.8.1199
Abstract

Background  Many inherited progressive encephalopathies have a poor outcome, and some are caused by repeat expansion mutations. How would the presence of 2 different expansion mutations affect the phenotype?

Objective  To describe a patient who has 2 distinct, rare genetic disorders: myotonic dystrophy (DM, OMIM 160900) and progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type (EPM1, OMIM 254800). Both conditions are caused by repeat expansion mutations. They affect the central nervous system causing mental retardation, but also produce a wide spectrum of disabilities in daily living.

Setting  Referral center.

Methods  Clinical description with accompanying photographs, electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging; DNA analysis of both of the mutations and chromosomal analysis with prometaphase spreads.

Results  The patient had clinical characteristics and findings of both myotonic dystrophy and progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type. Electroencephalographic recordings over a 3-year period showed typical findings for myoclonus epilepsy. The patient had no gross anomalies in brain magnetic resonance imaging. She had a normal karyotype, and both of the diagnoses were confirmed at the molecular level with the direct detection of the mutations.

Conclusions  Despite having 2 different progressive inherited disorders affecting the central nervous system, the patient, at age 28 years, showed only mild mental retardation with very slow progression. However, clear deterioration in activities of daily living has taken place during last 3 years.

MYOTONIC dystrophy (DM) is an autosomal-dominant disorder, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 8000 in all human populations.1 It is therefore the most common progressive muscular dystrophy of adulthood. Myotonic dystrophy is characterized by (1) ptosis and weakness of other facial, jaw, and anterior neck muscles; (2) distal weakness of the limbs; and (3) myotonia. The clinical picture is very variable. In some cases a mild cataract may be the only sign of the disease, whereas the congenital form may be fatal.2 The underlying gene is located in 19q13.3 and codes for a protein named dystrophia myotonica protein kinase (DMPK).3 Recently, a gene located in the untranslated region of DMPK just downstream of its coding region was described. It seems that the expression of this gene, named DMAHP (DM locus associated homeodomain protein) is also affected by the repeat expansion mutation in DMPK, thus contributing to the phenotypic variation seen in patients with DM.46 The [CTG]n repeat used in the diagnostics of DM is located in exon 15 of the DMPK gene.7 In the normal population this repeat is polymorphic, showing 5 to 35 copies of the CTG triplet.8 However, the triplet repeat is always expanded in patients with DM, and the number of copies (size) is even more variable, ranging from 50 to more than 2000. Increased size of the expansion correlates in general with increased severity of symptoms and with an earlier age of onset of the disease.9 The clinical diagnosis of DM is based on multiple classical features and positive electromyographic findings, which include polyphasic potentials and myotonic bursts. But in many cases, the diagnosis requires direct analysis of the triplet expansion mutation by DNA testing. Molecular diagnostics also offer an additional advantage by making the distinction between newly discovered proximal-type myotonic dystrophy and DM.1012

Progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type (EPM1) is an autosomal-recessive disorder that occurs with low frequency in many populations. It is most prevalent around the Baltic Sea,13,14 especially in Finland, where the incidence is 1 case per 20,000 births.13 It is also frequent in the western Mediterranean region.15 Progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type is characterized by onset at age 6 to 15 years, stimulus-sensitive myoclonus, tonic-clonic seizures, and progressive course.13,16 Typical electroencephalographic findings include symmetric, generalized and high-voltage spike-and-wave and polyspike-and-wave paroxysms. Sensitivity to photic stimulation is exceptionally high. With modern anticonvulsive therapy the symptoms are relatively well controlled, and the development of myclonus is not always progressive throughout life. In adulthood, the symptoms usually become less severe, and epileptic seizure activity may cease. On average, the intelligence level of patients with EPM1 is normal, although a slow decline is often seen over time. Using a positional cloning strategy, loss of function mutations in the gene encoding cystatin B (CSTB), a cysteine protease inhibitor, were found to be responsible for EPM1.1720 Later, an unstable expansion of a 12-mer (dodecamer) minisatellite repeat, located in the putative promoter region of the CSTB gene, was found to be the major cause of EPM1.2124 It accounts for most (approximately 92%) of the disease chromosomes in patients with EPM1 worldwide. Previously, the diagnosis of EPM1 was based solely on careful clinical evaluation of the patients and exclusion of other types of progressive myoclonus epilepsy.25 Currently, specific mutation-based DNA testing is available to confirm the diagnosis.16

CLINICAL HISTORY

Our patient was 28 years old when assessed. Her birth and perinatal period were uneventful, and motor milestones were passed uneventfully. The first signs of EPM1 occurred at age 8 years, when nightly myoclonic jerks appeared. Her first generalized seizure occurred at age 14 years. During the same year, the clinical diagnosis of EPM1 was made on the basis of electroencephalographic findings and clinical history. Her first symptoms of DM emerged during the second decade of life. At that time her main symptom was muscular weakness, which was most evident in her lower limbs. By age 13 years, her electromyographic findings were compatible with DM. Slow deterioration of basic mental capacity began at age eight years, but she managed to pass normal school. By age 16 years she had developed a scoliosis of 65°, which was surgically corrected, and had had 5 atrial fibrillation attacks requiring electric cardioversion. At age 21 years, she underwent a thorough cardiologic examination, including both echocardiography and a 24-hour electrocardiography registration, which were both normal. The results of neuropsychological tests (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Wechsler Memory Scale, Benton, Luria, Poppelreuter, Raven, and Stroop) taken at age 22 years showed dyscalculia, poor short-term memory, and difficulties in visuospatial thinking, but the overall level of cognitive capacity was considered within the normal range. At age 23 years she was institutionalized because of behavioral problems and poor seizure control. Before her current valproate-lamotrigine-clonazepam combination therapy, she had several incidents of epileptic status together with numerous generalized seizures. On 2 occasions, her condition was life-threatening, requiring general anaesthesia (latest at age 23 years) with subsequent intensive care treatments, prolonged recovery from a comatose state (longer than 1 week), and episodes of pneumonia. Figure 1 shows the pedigree, and Figure 2, photographs of our patient.

Figure 1.
The pedigree of our patient (arrow). There are no other cases of progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type (EMP1) in the family, but both parents are carriers of the EMP1 expansion mutation (gray). The patient and her father have myotonic dystrophy (DM) (black); DM in the father was first diagnosed on the basis of clinical findings and positive electromyographic findings, and was later confirmed by DNA analysis. At age 35 years, he had an expressionless face, ptosis, and atrophy of the distal hand musculature. Muscle biopsy specimens showed multiple features of DM. Results of ophthalmologic examination showed early signs of cataract, typical of DM. Advanced distal weakness of the legs led to his retirement at age 38 years.

The pedigree of our patient (arrow). There are no other cases of progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type (EMP1) in the family, but both parents are carriers of the EMP1 expansion mutation (gray). The patient and her father have myotonic dystrophy (DM) (black); DM in the father was first diagnosed on the basis of clinical findings and positive electromyographic findings, and was later confirmed by DNA analysis. At age 35 years, he had an expressionless face, ptosis, and atrophy of the distal hand musculature. Muscle biopsy specimens showed multiple features of DM. Results of ophthalmologic examination showed early signs of cataract, typical of DM. Advanced distal weakness of the legs led to his retirement at age 38 years.

Figure 2.
Patient photographs. Note the high hair line, ptosis, and otherwise characteristic facial features of myotonic dystrophy. Wasting of the anterior neck muscles is evident in the side view. Mild residual scoliosis can also be seen.

Patient photographs. Note the high hair line, ptosis, and otherwise characteristic facial features of myotonic dystrophy. Wasting of the anterior neck muscles is evident in the side view. Mild residual scoliosis can also be seen.

CURRENT STATUS

The last electromyographic study results were positive, but there was no clinical myotonia (no convincing percussion myotonia of the thenar musculature or the tongue). At age 23 years, our patient had no lens opacities. She now has mild tremor in her hands and head. She has mild ptosis and atrophy of the anterior neck muscles. Her speech is affected by the weakness of her cheeks; she cannot whistle or retain air in her cheeks. Distal limb weakness is evident as well as atrophy of the hand muscles. She is unable to walk alone but can stand up and to some extent move with a wheelchair. Both hand and leg movements are ataxic, and she is occasionally unable to feed herself. She cannot straighten her legs properly to full length while standing, and she has a residual scoliosis of 35°. Cardiac arrhythmia, which she experienced during the second decade of her life, has not been a recent clinical problem. She has not had any seizures since she was 25 years old. During the last 4 years, there has been only 1 incident that was regarded as a pseudoseizure. Our patient is now being treated with sodium valproate (2200 mg/d), lamotrigine (50 mg/d), clonazepam (2 mg/d), and fluoxetine (10 mg/d).

Her mental status has slowly deteriorated, and by age 25 years she had mild mental retardation (IQ class 50-69). Reevaluation at age 27 years (Wechsler Adult Intelligenc Scale plus an interview) showed that her overall cognitive capacity was unchanged. She could follow television programs and generally recalled events well from the past week. During the last few years, her interest in contemporary world events as reported in the media has declined, and her ability to read and to understand written text has deteriorated.

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE FINDINGS

Her interictal electroencephalographic recordings have been typical for EMP1 with background slowing and generalized spike-and-wave or polyspike discharges and myoclonias on photic stimulation. No progression has occurred in control registrations over a 3-year period. Brain magnetic resonance imaging has shown no focal pathologic changes in the brain parenchyma. Subarachnoid spaces are rather large in all areas (cortical, central, and cerebellar), especially frontally, where the sulci are bilaterally deep. Also, the sylvian fissure seems rather wide. In addition, the bony structure of the skull is thick (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
Magnetic resonance images of our patient. Left, T1-weighted coronal section, where basal ganglia and surrounding structures (asterisk) appear normal. Center, T2-weighted coronal section, where normal cerebellar structures are seen. Right, T1-weighted axial section showing normal basal ganglia (asterisk). Arrow indicates a large frontal sinus in clearly thickened frontal bone. In all images, the relatively enlarged subarachnoid spaces are apparent.

Magnetic resonance images of our patient. Left, T1-weighted coronal section, where basal ganglia and surrounding structures (asterisk) appear normal. Center, T2-weighted coronal section, where normal cerebellar structures are seen. Right, T1-weighted axial section showing normal basal ganglia (asterisk). Arrow indicates a large frontal sinus in clearly thickened frontal bone. In all images, the relatively enlarged subarachnoid spaces are apparent.

DNA AND CHROMOSOMAL ANALYSIS

Our patient's diagnoses of both DM and EPM1 were confirmed by DNA analysis. Figure 4 shows a Southern blot analysis with Bgl1 digest hybridized with probe p5B1.4,26 where an extra allele is clearly visible. Figure 5 illustrates the structure of the DMPK gene with special reference to DNA fragments created by different restriction enzymes. In normal cases, Bgl1 creates only a 3.4-kilobase fragment. The diagnosis of EPM1 was confirmed by Southern blot analysis of Pst l-digested DNA hybridized with a cystatin B complementary DNA probe (Figure 6).16,21 The transmission of the expanded alleles is shown by arrows. Figure 7 shows the localization of the 12-mer expansion in the putative promoter region of the CSTB and the short distance from the first exon of this gene. In prometaphase spreads, the patient had normal karyotype 46,XX.

Figure 4.
Southern blot analysis of our patient's myotonic dystrophy shows an expanded Bgl1 fragment indicating an expansion larger than 150 copies of the CTG motif. The lanes of interest (starred) contain DNA samples of different concentrations. A reduction in the copy number has taken place because the patient's father has an expanded Bgl1 allele of 5 to 6 kilobases (kb) in size (data not shown).

Southern blot analysis of our patient's myotonic dystrophy shows an expanded Bgl1 fragment indicating an expansion larger than 150 copies of the CTG motif. The lanes of interest (starred) contain DNA samples of different concentrations. A reduction in the copy number has taken place because the patient's father has an expanded Bgl1 allele of 5 to 6 kilobases (kb) in size (data not shown).

Figure 5.
The human myotonic dystrophy (DM) protein kinase gene and the localization of the probe p5B1.4 used in the detection of the DM mutation. The top of the figure shows the reduction of the target fragments on various restriction enzyme digests (E, Eco Rl; B, Bam H1; Bg, Bgl 1). Exon 15 contains the [CTG]n motif expanded in patients with DM, shown as a black box. kb Indicates kilobase; Alu, Alu repeat.

The human myotonic dystrophy (DM) protein kinase gene and the localization of the probe p5B1.4 used in the detection of the DM mutation. The top of the figure shows the reduction of the target fragments on various restriction enzyme digests (E, Eco Rl; B, Bam H1; Bg, Bgl 1). Exon 15 contains the [CTG]n motif expanded in patients with DM, shown as a black box.3,7,9,2731 kb Indicates kilobase; Alu, Alu repeat.

Figure 6.
Southern blot analysis showing enlarged restriction fragments in patients with progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type (EPM1). The DNA has been digested with restriction enzyme Ps tl, and the blot has been hybridized with the cystatin B complementary DNA as a probe. Control individuals show the normal 2.6-kilobase (kb) restriction fragment. Lanes marked EPM1+ contain DNA from patients for whom the enlarged fragment size has been determined: the normal-sized fragment is absent, and abnormally enlarged restriction fragments occur instead. The transmission of enlarged alleles from the father and mother of our patient is indicated with arrows on the blot. A faint constant fragment (C) occurs in all individuals.

Southern blot analysis showing enlarged restriction fragments in patients with progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the Unverricht-Lundborg type (EPM1). The DNA has been digested with restriction enzyme Ps tl, and the blot has been hybridized with the cystatin B complementary DNA as a probe. Control individuals show the normal 2.6-kilobase (kb) restriction fragment. Lanes marked EPM1+ contain DNA from patients for whom the enlarged fragment size has been determined21: the normal-sized fragment is absent, and abnormally enlarged restriction fragments occur instead. The transmission of enlarged alleles from the father and mother of our patient is indicated with arrows on the blot. A faint constant fragment (C) occurs in all individuals.

Figure 7.
Illustration of the structure of the cystatin B (CSTB) gene and an enlarged view of the putative promoter region of the gene showing the location and sequence of the normally polymorphic (2 or 3 copies) 12-mer (dodecamer) repeat. H indicates Hin dlll; E, Eco RI; and P, Ps tl.

Illustration of the structure of the cystatin B (CSTB) gene and an enlarged view of the putative promoter region of the gene showing the location and sequence of the normally polymorphic (2 or 3 copies) 12-mer (dodecamer) repeat. H indicates Hin dlll; E, Eco RI; and P, Ps tl.

COMMENT

Our patient shows the clinical symptoms and signs of 2 inherited disorders: DM and EPM1. Her case history and all the electrophysiological and imaging findings are consistent with both of these diagnoses. Moreover, findings of direct DNA analyses reveal the pathognomonic mutations for both disorders. The probability for this combination of genetic disorders occurring concomitantly by chance is well over 1 in 160 million, and in this respect her condition can be regarded as unique (8000 × 20,000 for DM and EPM1, respectively, for the later incidence in Finland; EPM1 is more rare than this in global perspective). Quite remarkably, both of these syndromes are caused by unstable expansion mutations, and both of them also affect the central nervous system. Given the progressive nature of these syndromes, one could expect severe mental deterioration with marked additional disabilities by the end of third decade of life. However, our patient has only mild mental retardation with relatively late deterioration of activities of daily living.

The clinical disabilities produced by these 2 mutations are manifold. In our patient, loss of distal muscle strength has been considerable, but clinical myotonia has not been a feature. Our patient had a relatively late deterioration of activities of daily living. An expected arrhythmic tendency and epileptic activity have ceased. The clinical history demonstrates that with the present treatment, cognition is relatively spared during the disease processes. The clinical symptoms of EPM1 progress insidiously and in general become prominent in the teenage years. Previously, the symptoms were progressive throughout life, and the shortening of lifespan was associated with the use of phenytoin.14 The drug treatment of choice is now sodium valproate, which has increased the life expectancy and the functional capacity of patients. As add-on therapy, clonazepam and lamotrigine may be used. With current effective polytherapy, patients now live to their 60s.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for publication May 27, 1999.

This study was funded by the Arvo Lea and Arvo Ylppö Foundation, Espoo, Finland; the Finnish Medical Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Turku, Finland; and the Academy of Finland, Helsinki.

The authors wish to acknowledge Aarno Palotie, MD, PhD, for providing the DNA diagnostics of DM and Hannu Somer, MD, PhD, for providing some of the clinical details.

Reprints: Pekka Nokelainen, MD, PhD, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, England (e-mail: pnokelai@molbiol.ox.ac.uk).

References
1.
Harper  PS Myotonic Dystrophy. 2nd ed. London, England WB Saunders Co1989;
2.
Griggs  RCWood  DSWorking Group on the Molecular Defect in Myotonic Dystrophy, Criteria for establishing the validity of genetic recombination in myotonic dystrophy. Neurology. 1989;39420- 421Article
3.
Brook  JDMcCurrach  MEHarley  HG  et al.  Molecular basis of myotonic dystrophy: expansion of a trinucleotide (CTG) repeat at the 3-prime end of a transcript encoding a protein kinase family member. Cell. 1992;68799- 808Article
4.
Klesert  TROtten  ADBird  TDTapscott  SJ Trinucleotide repeat expansion at the myotonic dystrophy locus reduces expression of DMAHP. Nat Genet. 1997;16402- 406Article
5.
Thornton  CAWymer  JPSimmons  ZMcClain  CMoxley  RT  III Expansion of the myotonic dystrophy CTG repeat reduces expression of the flanking DMAHP gene. Nat Genet. 1997;16407- 409Article
6.
Goldberg  YP Hotspots—caught in the middle: two genes troubled by trinucleotide expansion in myotonic dystrophy [editorial]. Clin Genet. 1998;53426- 432Article
7.
Shaw  DJMcCurrach  MRundle  SA Genomic organization and transcriptional units at the myotonic dystrophy locus. Genomics. 1993;18673- 679Article
8.
Davies  JYamagata  HShelbourne  P  et al.  Comparison of the myotonic dystrophy associated CTG repeat in European and Japanese populations. J Med Genet. 1992;29766- 769Article
9.
Harley  HGRundle  SAReardon  W  et al.  Unstable DNA sequence in myotonic dystrophy. Lancet. 1992;91126- 1128
10.
Ricker  KKoch  MCLehmann-Horn  F  et al.  Proximal myotonic myopathy: a new dominant disorder with myotonia, muscle weakness, and cataracts. Neurology. 1994;441448- 1452Article
11.
Ranum  LPWRasmussen  PFBenzow  KAKoob  MDDay  JW Genetic mapping of a second myotonic dystrophy locus. Nat Genet. 1998;19196- 198Article
12.
Rowland  LP Thornton-Griggs-Moxley disease: myotonic dystrophy type 2. Ann Neurol. 1994;36803- 804Article
13.
Norio  RKoskiniemi  M Progressive myoclonus epilepsy: genetic and nosological aspects with special reference to 107 Finnish patients. Clin Genet. 1979;15382- 398Article
14.
Eldridge  RIivanainen  MStern  RKoerber  TWilder  BJ "Baltic" myoclonus epilepsy: hereditary disorder of childhood made worse by phenytoin. Lancet. 1983;2838- 842Article
15.
Genton  PMichelucci  RTasinari  CARoger  J The Ramsey Hunt syndrome revisited: Mediterranean myoclonus versus mitochondrial encephalopathy with ragged-red fibres and Baltic myoclonus. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;818- 15Article
16.
Lehesjoki  A-EKoskiniemi  M Clinical features and genetics of progressive myoclonus epilepsy of Unverricht-Lundborg type. Ann Med. 1998;30474- 480Article
17.
Lehesjoki  A-EKoskiniemi  MSistonen  P  et al.  Localization of a gene for progressive myoclonus epilepsy to chromosome 21q22. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1991;883696- 3699Article
18.
Lehesjoki  A-EKoskiniemi  MNorio  RTirrito  S  et al.  Localization of the EMP1 gene for progressive myoclonus epilepsy on chromosome 21: linkage disequilibrium allows high resolution mapping. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;21229- 1234Article
19.
Virtaneva  KMiao  JTräskelin  AL  et al.  Progressive myoclonus epilepsy EPM1 locus maps to a 175kb interval in distal 21q. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;581247- 1253
20.
Pennacchio  LALehesjoki  A-EStone  NE  et al.  Mutations in the gene encoding cystatin B in progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1). Science. 1996;2711731- 1734Article
21.
Virtaneva  KD'Amato  EMiao  J  et al.  Unstable minisatellite expansion causing recessively inherited myoclonus epilepsy, EPM1. Nat Genet. 1997;15393- 396Article
22.
Virtaneva  KPaulin  LKrahe  Rde la Chapelle  ALehesjoki  A-E The minisatellite expansion mutation in EPM1: resolution of an initial discrepancy. Hum Mut. 1998;12218
23.
Lalioti  MDScott  HSBuresi  C  et al.  Dodecamer repeat expansion in cystatin B gene in progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Nature. 1997;386847- 851Article
24.
Lafreniere  RGRochefort  DLChretien  N  et al.  Unstable insertion in the 5′-flanking region of the cystatin-B gene is the most common mutation in progressive myoclonus epilepsy type-1, EPM1. Nat Genet. 1997;15393- 396Article
25.
Marseille Consensus Group, Classification of progressive myoclonus epilepsies and related disorders. Ann Neurol. 1990;28113- 116Article
26.
Shelbourne  PDavies  JBuxton  J  et al.  Direct diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy with a disease-specific DNA marker. N Engl J Med. 1993;328471- 475Article
27.
Mahadevan  MSAmemiya  CJansen  G  et al.  Structure and genomic sequence of the myotonic dystrophy (DM kinase) gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2299- 304Article
28.
Mahadevan  MSFoitzik  MASurh  LCKorneluk  RG Characterization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of an Alu deletion polymorphism in total linkage disequilibrium with myotonic dystrophy. Genomics. 1993;15446- 448Article
29.
Harley  HGBrook  JDRundle  S  et al.  Expansion of an unstable region and phenotypic variation in myotonic dystrophy. Nature. 1992;355545- 546Article
30.
Shelbourne  PWinqvist  RKunert  E  et al.  Unstable DNA may be responsible for the incomplete penetrance of the myotonic dystrophy phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1467- 473Article
31.
Jansen  GMahadevan  MAmemiya  C  et al.  Characterization of the myotonic dystrophy region predicts multiple protein isoform-encoding mRNAs. Nat Genet. 1992;1261- 266Article
×