Immunophenotyping and laser microdissection in a case of acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin λ light chain amyloidosis (case 1). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sural nerve biopsy with clinical diagnosis of λ amyloidosis immunostained with λ (A), κ (B), transthyretin (C), and serum amyloid P-component (D) shows histologic uncertainty of the amyloid subtype characterized by nonspecific diffuse staining of endoneurial amyloid. E, A Congo red–stained section viewed under fluorescent birefringence and used for laser microdissection shows congophilia under polarized light, with birefringence areas targeted (circled and numbered 1-4) for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Laser microdissection was done with Leica Laser Microdissection software version 6.6.0 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzler, Germany). F, The proteins identified from the microdissected areas (samples 1-4); starred proteins are known to be causative or associated with amyloid, and the other nonamyloid identified proteins are shown in truncation. The proteins are listed by their UniProt nomenclature.23 For each protein identified from laser microdissection regions, a statistical probability of definite protein identification is indicated as a percentage. The percentage of identified amino acid coverage of the protein in each sample is given for Ig λ C region (G), with the amino acid sequence of Ig λ C regions (accession LAC_HUMAN) identified in this particular sample shown in yellow (H). In this case and the other 20 cases studied, all had peptides known to be associated with amyloidosis neuropathy (Ig λ, Ig κ, gelsolin, transthyretin, and serum amyloid P-component) identified. Also identified were other peptides associated with amyloid: apolipoprotein E (accession APOE_HUMAN) Ig γ-1 chain C region (accession IGHG1_HUMAN); apolipoprotein A4 (accession APOA4_HUMAN); serum amyloid P-component (accession SAMP_HUMAN); and apolipoprotein A1 (accession APOA1_HUMAN).
Klein CJ, Vrana JA, Theis JD, Dyck PJ, Dyck PJB, Spinner RJ, Mauermann ML, Bergen HR, Zeldenrust SR, Dogan A. Mass Spectrometric–Based Proteomic Analysis of Amyloid Neuropathy Type in Nerve Tissue. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(2):195-199. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.261
The clinical involvement, prognosis, and treatment of amyloid neuropathies are directly related to the specific causative amyloid protein.1,2 Congo red staining of amyloid demonstrates characteristic birefringence under polarized light,3 but subtyping amyloid can be challenging. Infiltration of amyloid typically occurs in distal peripheral nerves including autonomic small fibers,2 occasionally in isolated proximal plexus and spinal roots, which is referred to as an amyloidoma.4 Peripheral nerve tissue involvement is frequently the initial presenting feature of systemic amyloidosis.5,6 The known amyloid proteins associated with neuropathy include immunoglobulin κ or λ light chains, transthyretin (TTR), gelsolin, and, most rarely, apolipoprotein A1. The mechanisms that cause these proteins to transform from their precursors to amyloid fibril aggregation are not understood. Several proteins including serum amyloid P-component7 and apolipoprotein E8- 10 have been associated with amyloid pathogenesis, and their identification is helpful in the diagnosis of amyloidosis.
Acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain (AL)–type amyloidosis caused by immunoglobulin κ or λ light chain deposition is the most common type of amyloidosis-associated neuropathy. The other types of amyloidosis affecting nerves are caused by mutations in the TTR gene (OMIM 105210) (ATTR) and the GSN gene (OMIM 105120) (AGEL) with autosomal dominant inheritance, with ATTR being more common.1 Clinically, ATTR is not easily distinguished from AL amyloidosis, while AGEL has facial diplegia and corneal lattice dystrophy, which may be early distinguishing features.11 Inherited amyloidosis is frequently overlooked for complex reasons, including the following: (1) coexisting incidental monoclonal proteins; (2) lack of family history owing to varied age at onset and penetrance; and (3) small families or disrupted family dynamics. A large retrospective study demonstrated that up to 9% of patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy were misclassified and treated for AL-primary amyloidosis.12
The specific approach for treating amyloidosis depends on the type of amyloid. High-risk aggressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation may be used in AL-type amyloidosis,13 whereas liver transplantation and emerging protein stabilizing therapies have shown promising results in ATTR.14- 16 For patients with AGEL, life is not threatened but treatment is limited, with no currently available therapeutics to prevent ongoing amyloid deposition. Various supportive therapies for certain symptoms have also been used, such as lubrication of the eyes and reconstructive surgery for facial and corneal abnormalities. Therapeutic small molecules are now being investigated based on the specific underlying cause.17 Incorrect diagnosis of the amyloid type can lead to substantial incurred risk from inappropriate treatment.12,18
Subtyping the specific amyloid proteins by immunohistochemical staining has been challenging as the antigenic epitope may be lost by formalin cross-linking and circulating serum proteins (TTR and monoclonal proteins) may contaminate tissue preparations.19 Additionally, comparing the staining intensities of different amyloid antibodies is often required and can be problematic. Recently, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with laser microdissection (LMD) of amyloid plaques from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues has shown great promise in subtyping systemic and localized amyloid.8,20 In this study, we explore the utility of LMD and LC-MS/MS for the evaluation of peripheral nerve tissues infiltrated by amyloid.
The Mayo Clinic peripheral nerve laboratory records were searched for cases of amyloidosis with subtypes that could not be determined through immunohistochemical staining. All cases must be diagnosed with a specific amyloid type using various tests. The criteria for clinical diagnosis included the presence of serum monoclonal proteins consistent with AL-type amyloidosis and mutation detection in patients or in their first-degree relatives through DNA sequencing of TTR and GSN. We carried out DNA sequencing for 5 of 8 patients with AL-type amyloid neuropathy to exclude the possibility of TTR amyloidosis (Table). The FFPE nerve sections were used in amyloid diagnosis. All cases were reviewed and interpreted by nerve pathologists (C.J.K., P.J.D., and P.J.B.D.) with LMD amyloid areas reviewed by a hematopathologist (A.D.). Immunohistochemical preparations of all nerve tissues had been read in conjunction with clinical information including knowledge of monoclonal serum proteins and with all accessible record information. In contrast, the analyses of the LMD and LC-MS/MS results for all cases were interpreted by 3 of us (J.A.V., J.D.T., and A.D.), who were blinded to the clinical information. Clinical data, demographic characteristics, and follow-up information were obtained from retrospective record review and from prior consultation correspondence. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the Mayo Clinic.
The LMD and LC-MS/MS methods have been previously summarized in full text and supplemental forms.8,20 All cases had Congo red birefringence identified prior to LMD from FFPE nerve tissue. The duration of storage for FFPE nerve tissues ranged from 2 weeks to 12 years. Ten-micrometer-thick sections were placed on DIRECTOR slides (Expression Pathology Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland) for LMD. Two to four separate areas of amyloid deposition were microdissected and analyzed. Equal tissue volumes were collected (60 000 μm2) by LMD into 0.5-mL microcentrifuge tube caps containing 10mM Tris/1mM EDTA/0.002% Zwittergent 3-16 (Calbiochem, San Diego, California) using a DM6000B Microdissection System (Leica Microsystems, Wetzler, Germany). Collected tissues were heated at 98°C for 90 minutes with occasional vortexing. Following 60 minutes of sonication in a water bath, samples were digested overnight at 37°C with trypsin (Promega Corp, Madison, Wisconsin).
Trypsin digests of LMD amyloid were reduced with dithiothreitol and separated by nanoflow LC electrospray MS/MS using a Thermo Finnigan LTQ Orbitrap Hybrid Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corp, Bremen, Germany) coupled to an Eksigent nanoflow LC 2-dimensional high-performance LC system (Eksigent, Dublin, California). The MS/MS raw data were converted to DTA files using BioWorks version 3.2 software (Thermo Electron Corp) and correlated with theoretical fragmentation patterns of tryptic peptide sequences of the Swiss-Prot database using Scaffold software (Proteome Software, Inc, Portland, Oregon). The Scaffold software is used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identification search algorithms including Mascot version 2.2.04 (Matrix Science Ltd, London, England), Sequest version 27.12 (Thermo Finnigan LLC, San Jose, California), and X! Tandem version 2006.09.15.3 (Global Proteome Machine Organization, http://www.thegpm.org). The peptides were accepted using the ProteinProphet algorithm when greater than 90.0% probability occurred and at least 2 identified queried proteins were found.21,22 Identification of previously identified TTR mutations was additionally performed and not previously reported. Molecular weights of known TTR mutants were appended to the database of searched molecules for specific mutation identification in addition to available proteins in the Swiss-Prot database (https://portal.biobase-international.com/cgi-bin/portal/login.cgi).
Immunohistochemical stains had been performed by standard approach20 with Autostainer (Dako North America, Inc, Carpinteria, California) using an EnVision + Dual Link or ADVANCE (Dako North America, Inc) detection system. Antibodies were directed against the following antigens, with the corresponding clones for the monoclonal antibodies specified: κ free light chains (polyclonal; dilution, 1:6000; Dako North America, Inc), κ light chain (Auto ProEnzyme pretreatment; polyclonal; dilution, 1:2500; Dako North America, Inc), λ free light chains (polyclonal; dilution, 1:2000; Dako North America, Inc), λ light chain (Auto ProEnzyme pretreatment; polyclonal; dilution, 1:3000; Dako North America, Inc), prealbumin (TTR) (polyclonal; dilution, 1:5000; Dako North America, Inc), serum amyloid A (clone MC-1; dilution, 1:1000; Dako North America, Inc), and serum amyloid P-component (polyclonal; dilution, 1:20; Biocare Medical LLC).
Twenty-one cases with a definitive clinical diagnosis were identified for LMD and LC-MS/MS analysis. Their clinical diagnosis and results from MS/MS are summarized in the Table. At the time of biopsy, the median age was 60 years (range, 32-76 years); there were 6 women and 15 men. In all cases, the congophilic amyloid-infiltrated nerve tissue stained positively on immunostaining for serum amyloid P-component, but subtyping for distinction of TTR, κ light chain, and λ light chain was not possible as illustrated by nonspecific staining in case 1 (Figure, A-D). In contrast, proteomic analysis by LMD/MS was able to accurately identify specific amyloid protein in the representative case 1 (Figure, F) and the other 20 cases tested. Identified amyloid proteins in 21 cases were consistent with the results from clinical diagnosis, and the results were concordant between different LMD areas (Figure, E). All AL-type amyloidosis cases showed identified specific serum monoclonal proteins through analysis by LC-MS/MS. One patient with AL-type amyloidosis (case 6) was diagnosed with a serum biclonal gammopathy of IgG κ and λ light chains, but only κ amyloid type was identified by LMD/MS. In 2 elderly patients with ATTR, incidental serum monoclonal proteins (case 20 with IgM κ light chain and case 21 with IgG λ light chain) did not interfere with TTR mutation (Val30Met) identification by LMD/MS. Two cases with AGEL (1 with the Asp187Asn mutation and 1 not sequenced) were identified. The patient with AGEL who had no sequencing finding had clinical features and a family history of gelsolin amyloidosis. She had facial diplegia and corneal lattice dystrophy for 10 years; these were characteristic of her father and 1 sister who both had positive GSN genetic testing results, but the specific mutation was not disclosed in records from another institution. The mutations identified by LMD/MS in 10 patients with ATTR are 100% concordant with the previous DNA sequencing results (3 with the Val30Met mutation, 2 with the Val32Ala mutation, 2 with the Thr60Ala mutation, 1 with the Ala109Ser mutation, 1 with the Phe64Leu mutation, and 1 with the Ala97Ser mutation). The patient with ATTR who had no sequencing finding had a report of a positive family history and unspecified TTR mutation confirmation in 1 first-degree relative based on the records from another institution. One patient (case 7), whom we previously described,4 had lumbosacral root biopsy for an amyloidoma affecting the cauda equine; κ amyloid was identified in this case. Two cases (case 8 with κ AL-type amyloidosis and case 19 with ATTR) had neuropathy with focal sciatic enlargements or conduction blocks that led to proximal targeted fascicular nerve biopsy. On average, each case had 200 additional proteins identified along with the known pathologic proteins (Figure, F).
Identifying a specific causative amyloid protein from nerves and other tissues is often difficult but important in diagnosis and treatment. The results from this study extend LMD/MS application to nerves beyond application in other tissues described previously.8,20 In this article, we identified the specific amyloid subtype in 21 different nerve biopsies by LMD/MS without assistance from clinical information. The nerve immunohistochemical staining in these cases failed to determine the specific amyloid type despite assistance from available clinical information. With further validation and ongoing improvements, this approach has potential to reach the earlier-stated goal for MS/MS, namely biomarker discovery without clinical bias.24 Additionally, this study demonstrates that LMD/MS can determine not only amyloid type but also specific TTR mutations from infiltrated nerve tissue. Because TTR normally circulates in the serum, identifying the specific mutation from amyloid-infiltrated tissue provides greater specificity of the pathologic cause. However, the current limitations for mutation identification with LMD/MS are highlighted by our gelsolin cases and 1 of 11 TTR cases where a mutant amino acid sequence could not be determined. The practical issues for LMD/MS mutation identification include the following: (1) the mutations must be known or available in protein databases; (2) amino acid changes must lead to alterations enough for detection; (3) if the mutations occur at the sites of tryptic digestion, the mutant protein may be too large to be detected; and (4) there must be adequate quantities of mutant protein for MS analysis. In the 3 cases where mutation identification had failed, the aforementioned issues are all potential limiting factors. As the number of reported mutations in protein databases increases and the protein concentration requirement decreases, some limitations will diminish but the others will remain until the technology advances further.
In 2 of our genetically confirmed ATTR cases (cases 20 and 21), coexisting incidental serum monoclonal proteins did not interfere with LMD/MS tissue diagnosis of ATTR. The occurrence of incidental monoclonal proteins in cases with familial amyloidosis was the main factor that led to misdiagnosis in one large study.12 Additionally, the specific IgG κ amyloid subtype was identified in 1 patient with AL-type amyloidosis (case 6) diagnosed with biclonal gammopathy. Our results suggest that LMD/MS analysis is unlikely to make a misdiagnosis from serum monoclonal protein contamination.
Using a probability-based algorithm for mapping amino acid sequences of detected peptides, it is possible to identify the amyloid subtype with high specificity and sensitivity through LMD/MS.25,26 Increasingly, application of LMD/MS-assisted proteomic analysis is predicted to provide a practical approach in neurologic diseases for which the identification of the specific pathologic protein is crucial. Among patients with clear multisystem involvement including neuropathy, sural nerve biopsy may be a relatively less invasive process than biopsies of some organs such as the heart and kidneys. Additionally, the LMD/MS technique has potential to eventually be applied to muscle and skin biopsies, which are less invasive. However, currently those tissues are typically prepared for frozen sections, whereas the LMD/MS technique requires FFPE tissues. The current ability to apply this novel proteomic technique to routine clinical practice relates to a number of factors, including the tissue preparation methods, the refinement of LMD to allow increased concentration of pathologic tissue, and the improvement of bioinformatics tools for MS analysis.
Among the various types of amyloidosis, little is known about the pathogenesis leading from the conversion of mutated or aberrant proteins to the deposition of fibril formation. Proteomic analysis with LMD/MS can help define not only the specific amyloid protein but also the proteins associated with pathogenic amyloid protein. Our data confirm that serum amyloid P-component and apolipoprotein E are associated with various amyloid proteins.8- 10 In each of our cases, approximately 200 other proteins were identified; most of them are not known to be related to amyloidosis. The finding may provide further clues for disease pathogenesis. Broader application of LMD/MS analysis in other neurologic disorders is predicted for the diagnosis and understanding of disease pathogenesis.
Correspondence: Christopher J. Klein, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Accepted for Publication: August 23, 2010.
Published Online: October 11, 2010. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.261
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Klein, Vrana, P. J. B. Dyck, Bergen, Zeldenrust, and Dogan. Acquisition of data: Klein, Vrana, Theis, P. J. Dyck, P. J. B. Dyck, Spinner, Mauermann, and Dogan. Analysis and interpretation of data: Klein, Vrana, Theis, P. J. Dyck, P. J. B. Dyck, Mauermann, and Dogan. Drafting of the manuscript: Klein, Vrana, P. J. B. Dyck, and Dogan. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Klein, Theis, P. J. Dyck, Spinner, Mauermann, Bergen, and Zeldenrust. Obtained funding: Klein, P. J. Dyck, and Dogan. Administrative, technical, and material support: Klein, Vrana, Theis, P. J. Dyck, P. J. B. Dyck, Spinner, and Bergen. Study supervision: Klein.
Financial Disclosure: Drs Vrana and Dogan and Mr Theis are listed as inventors of the mass spectrometric–based method described in the article in a patent application with the US Patent and Trademark Office.
Additional Contributions: Fausto Rodriquez, MD, provided helpful discussion in preparation of the manuscript, JanNean Englestad, AS, provided help in preparation of the Figure, and Larry Witt, AS, provided paraffin tissue preparation.