[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 258
Citations 0
From The JAMA Network
January 2017

Outcomes of Open vs Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resection

Author Affiliations
  • 1Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(1):115-116. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3205

The ACOSOG Z5061 trial’s primary aim was to determine whether a laparoscopic rectal cancer resection could be deemed noninferior to an open resection. The study was powered to assess oncological success based on pathologic analysis of the resected specimen. Fleshman et al need to be congratulated for having carefully conducted and honestly analyzed an important study.1 They utilized a novel composite assessment score based on both circumferential resection margin (CRM) and distal resection margin (DRM) status as well as quality of the total mesorectal excision (complete, nearly complete, incomplete) as the primary outcome measure. Noninferiority would be declared if the lower bound border of the 95% CI for the difference between the groups was greater than −6%. The 6% threshold was chosen based on clinical relevance estimation from medical oncology trials.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview