[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.54.109. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 284
Citations 0
Comment & Response
August 2016

Zika Virus, Microcephaly, and Ocular Findings—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(8):946. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1307

In Reply We thank Moshfeghi and colleagues for their comments on the article by de Paula Freitas et al and our Invited Commentary on the ocular finding of babies born with microcephaly presumed secondary to maternal ZIKV infection. Moshfeghi et al suggest that the ocular findings described by de Paula Freitas et al may be a result of the microcephaly itself rather than ZIKV involvement of the eye. Microcephaly is not a disease. It is a physical finding that results from neurodegeneration of the brain. The causes of this neurodegeneration are diverse, including genetic, metabolic, infectious, traumatic, and others. Although microcephaly from other causes, especially genetic, has been reported to be associated with retinal abnormalities, it is highly unlikely that the microcephaly itself causes the retinal abnormalities. Rather, it seems likely that each of these diseases damages the brain and some of them also damage the eye. Until ZIKV is isolated from the eye, as was done with Ebola virus, we will not be certain that the virus has actually invaded the eye. However, we doubt that the physical finding of microcephaly itself was the cause of the observed ocular abnormalities.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×