[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 543
Citations 0
Original Investigation
August 2016

Association of Fast Visual Field Loss With Risk of Falling in Patients With Glaucoma

Author Affiliations
  • 1Visual Performance Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(8):880-886. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1659
Abstract

Importance  Patients with glaucoma and a history of fast visual field loss might be at an increased risk for falls compared with those with a history of slow visual field loss, but, to date, this association has not been previously investigated in the literature.

Objective  To evaluate the association between self-reported falls and past rate of visual field loss in a cohort of patients with glaucoma followed up over time.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This observational cohort study included patients diagnosed as having glaucoma who had been followed up at the Visual Performance Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, at 6-month intervals for a mean (SD) of 7.5 (2.6) years from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2015. Self-reported number of falls during the past year was obtained at the last follow-up visit. Integrated binocular fields were estimated from the monocular fields. Linear mixed models were used to calculate rates of change in binocular mean sensitivity over time. Poisson models were used to evaluate the association between the self-reported number of falls and rates of visual field loss. The models adjusted for the current level of visual field damage and other confounding variables.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Association between rates of binocular visual field loss and self-reported number of falls.

Results  The study included 116 patients with glaucoma with a mean (SD) age of 73.1 (10.7) years (55 women [47.4%], 84 white individuals [72.4%], and 32 black individuals [27.6%]). Of the 116 patients, 29 (25.0%) reported at least 1 fall in the previous year. The mean rate of change in binocular mean sensitivity was faster for patients who reported a history of falls vs those who did not (−0.36 vs −0.17 dB/y; mean difference, 0.20 dB/y; 95% CI, 0.09-0.31 dB/y; P < .001). History of fast visual field loss was significantly associated with falls (rate ratio, 2.28 per 0.5 dB/y faster; 95% CI, 1.15-4.52 db/y; P = .02), even after adjusting for confounding factors.

Conclusions and Relevance  The rate of visual field loss was associated with a self-reported history of falls in the past year even after taking into account the magnitude of visual field defect. However, although a positive association was found, further studies are necessary to establish whether a cause-and-effect relationship exists between rate of visual field loss and self-reported history of falls.

×