[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.119.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
December 2004

Dreams of Canalostomies

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(12):1868-1869. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.12.1868

By the early 1970s, trabeculectomy had brought a more predictable outcomethan the established full-thickness filtration, but some compromise in thehypotensive response dampened widespread enthusiasm. About a decade later,Zimmerman et a1 modified trabeculectomy bydissecting away the inner wall of the Schlemm canal while preserving the low-resistancecorneoscleral component of the trabecular meshwork. Despite initial interest,the nearly simultaneous introduction of antimetabolite adjunctive therapyto conventional trabeculectomy deluged Zimmerman’s technically dauntingprocedure with the widely held expectation that antifibrotics would forgivea clumsy technical effort. It became apparent, however, that antimetabolitesmerely traded lower pressure for more complications, notably hypotony andleaking blebs, which were reminiscent of the full-thickness filtrations fromprevious decades.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×