[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.180.70. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1950

Worth's Squint.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1950;44(6):914. doi:10.1001/archopht.1950.00910020927018

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

This is in reality the eighth edition of Worth's "Squint," which has recently appeared under the pen of T. Keith Lyle. No one has had as much influence on the philosophy of squint since Worth's passing as Bernard Chavasse. Chavasse was the first to seize on the work of Sherrington, Magnus and Pavlov and to interpret squint as a perversion of the binocular reflexes. He was the first to place the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of strabismus on a sound psychological basis; and yet his book, for all its excellence of prose, required such careful reading and rereading that it was appreciated only by a relative few who were willing to give it the time it deserved.

Lyle has undertaken a difficult job and done it well. He has condensed the first edition and sought to clarify wherever possible some of the concepts of reflex development so as to make

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×