November 1959

Pupillary Escape in Disease of the Retina or Optic Nerve

Author Affiliations

Oakland, Calif.
From the Department of Ophthalmology, the Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;62(5):768-779. doi:10.1001/archopht.1959.04220050030005

Duke-Elder,1 in discussing the clinical picture of optic neuritis, mentions "a peculiar pupillary reaction common to all forms of conduction interference, wherein, although both the direct and consensual reactions are present the contraction is not maintained under bright illumination so that the pupil slowly dilates again while the light is still kept upon the eye." This seemingly paradoxical light reaction of the pupil was observed in retrobulbar neuritis by Marcus Gunn (1904), who attributed it to the consensual reaction of the pupil to darkness. In this paper is presented a simple and sensitive method for demonstrating the Marcus Gunn sign and, also, a hypothesis to show that there is nothing peculiar or paradoxical about this pupillary reaction, which should be expected whenever the light sense is reduced by disease of the retina or optic nerve.

Hypothesis  Assume that the pupillomotor impulses produced by visible light (and hence the stimuli

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview