[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1962

ANTI-CONTACTS

Author Affiliations

42 Weston St. Waltham 54, Mass.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;67(4):540-541. doi:10.1001/archopht.1962.00960020540031

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —At a time when all medicine, including ophthalmology, is emphasizing preventive practices, it is paradoxical that ophthalmologists be encouraged to not only tacitly approve but actively engage in a practice which can actually destroy the vision of a previously sound eye. Since I have waited in vain to read a condemnation of contact lenses as a replacement of spectacles for purely cosmetic reasons, I assume my objections are unique. Nevertheless, a dissent from the rising chorus of enthusiasm appears long overdue.Accurate statistics relative to the potential dangers of wearing contact lenses have been few. A recent paper by Cassady (Corneal Contact Lenses, Arch. Ophthal. 66:3, 1961) gives an incidence of corneal injury of 6%. Fortunately the injuries were almost all trifling, only 2 patients developing permanent corneal scarring and neither of these having visual reduction. But it must be emphasized that it is only luck which

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×