[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.127.188. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1964

PRECISE LANGUAGE

Author Affiliations

42 Weston St Waltham, Mass 02154

Arch Ophthalmol. 1964;71(2):292. doi:10.1001/archopht.1964.00970010308034

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  In few areas of practice is failure to formulate precise questions as noticeable as in refraction. How often do we hear the exasperated shout from the refraction lane, "Which is better, this or this?" Better than what? Better in what way? When the patient answers, "This is," which "this" does he mean, and does "better" have the same significance for him as it does for us?As experts in a hurry we may lose sight of the patient's almost complete ignorance of the technique of refraction and his anxiety to give the "right answers." Ambiguous and confusing questions result in ambiguous and confusing answers with resultant long refractions frustrating to physician and patient. On the contrary, to questions such as "Are the letters clearer with choice one or choice two?" or "What effect does this lens have on the letters?" there are almost always clear, short answers

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×