[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.127.188. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1964

Comparison of Visual and Pupillary Light Thresholds in Periphery

Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn
Fellow in Ophthalmology, Mayo Foundation (Dr. Burke); Section of Biophysics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation (Dr. Ogle).; Abridgment of thesis submitted by Dr. Burke to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ophthalmology.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1964;71(3):400-408. doi:10.1001/archopht.1964.00970010416019
Abstract

It is generally considered that the pupillary light threshold is slightly higher than the visual threshold. Although work done in this area has been limited, Schweitzer1 did publish an extensive study of this problem in 1956. He found that the pupillary and visual thresholds of the dark-adapted eye were identical when the entire retina was illuminated. When he stimulated small retinal areas, the threshold for a pupillary response was higher than the threshold for a visual response. His conclusion was that the luminous energy falling on larger areas was at least partially summated as far as the pupillary response was concerned.

Dr. Irene Loewenfeld2 had illuminated small areas of the retina, 40 degrees temporal to the fovea, in dark-adapted eyes. She found that the pupillary threshold was only 0.3 to 0.5 log unit higher than the visual threshold. She expressed the opinion that, depending upon whether and to

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×