[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.3.44. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1965

The Good and Bad of Research Support

Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;74(2):149-150. doi:10.1001/archopht.1965.00970040151001

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Support of medical research has exceeded in the past two decades anything dreamed of in the years prior to the Second World War. Proliferating foundations have, generally speaking, committed their funds to categorical disease entities while government agencies, represented chiefly by the National Institutes of Health, have spread their increasing support over the entire field of medical research.

Ophthalmology's part in this efflorescence of medical research has been average. In accordance with a familiar pattern, philanthropic organizations have sprung up with emotionally charged commitments to one disease. Some have matured to a beneficiary interest in support of general ophthalmic research. The NIH has dispensed its funds for ophthalmology through the Institute for Neurological Diseases and Blindness. The exemplary prudence which this Institute has exercised in allocation of government funds is no mean feat when one considers the sums involved, the antithetical groups which must be pacified, if not satisfied, and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×