[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.184.210. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1966

CRITERIA FOR MANAGEMENT OF MELANOSIS

Author Affiliations

Chief, Ophthalmic Pathology Branch Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Washington, DC

Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;76(2):307-308. doi:10.1001/archopht.1966.03850010309025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  Your Feature Photo captioned "Cancerous Melanosis" in the March issue followed by your editorial "Primum non nocere" in the April issue have prompted me to take up the pen. The editorial quite properly suggests that ophthalmic surgeons, along with many other physicians fighting cancer, have been guilty of excessive surgery. The two lesions specifically cited as examples of pseudocancerous conditions leading to unnecessary concern and to radical operations were nodular fasciitis and keratoacanthoma. While I agree that these lesions are sometimes treated more vigorously than is necessary, I doubt that very many exenterations have been done for them. On the other hand, I know that many have been performed after a diagnosis of cancerous melanosis has been made. A genuine malignant melanoma arising in an area of acquired melanosis of the conjunctiva carries a poor prognosis, and I will not quarrel here with those who believe that

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×