[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.169.191. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1967

REPLY TO DR. SNYDACKER

Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;77(6):848. doi:10.1001/archopht.1967.00980020850037

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.  —We appreciate Dr. Snydacker's letter bringing attention to the fine work of Dr. Gernet. We agree that with proper stabilization of the patient's head and of the contact-ring transducer, as described by Gernet and also by Jansson, there is no significant distortion of the globe. In this respect our system offers no particular advantage as it, too, causes no distortion of the globe (Arch Ophthal77:124 [Jan] 1967).We must admit, however, that we see no advantage in combining optical with ultrasonic measurements, since the statistical loss of accuracy found in a combined measurement technique outweighs the slightly greater accuracy of the optical measurement as compared to the ultrasonic measurement of the anterior chamber (0.036-mm error compared to 0.032-mm error respectively according to Jansson: Measurement of Intraocular Distances by Ultrasound and Comparison Between Optical and Ultrasonic Determination of the Depth of the Anterior Chamber, Acta Ophthal

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×