[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.148.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1969

Comparison of Localization of Orbital Foreign Bodies by Radiologic and Ultrasonic Methods

Author Affiliations

USA, Washington, DC; Chula Vista, Calif
From the Ophthalmology Service, Walter Reed General Hospital, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;81(4):512-517. doi:10.1001/archopht.1969.00990010514009
Abstract

Seventeen eyes with suspected ocular foreign bodies were studied by ultrasonic and radiographic techniques. The methods used for examination of the patients in this study were artificial because of the absence of information afforded the laboratory physician. The laboratory data had to be obtained and interpreted under conditions almost devoid of clinical information.

Comparison of the two methods revealed agreement in cases where no foreign body was present (three eyes). In the presence of single intraocular foreign bodies, there was good correlation. Multiple foreign bodies and intralenticular and intrascleral foreign bodies were missed ultrasonically and detected radiologically. From this study, it would appear that ultrasound is a valuable complementary and confirmatory technique, but not a substitute for radiographic diagnosis and localization of intraocular foreign bodies.

×