[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.249.135. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1977

Bacteriologic Safety of Using Tissue-Culture Storage-Reply

Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(3):519. doi:10.1001/archopht.1977.04450030161025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—Drs Mishler and Keates report their inability to culture bacteria from corneal-scleral remnants and McCarey-Kaufman media immediately following keratoplasty. Lacking the details of their technique, I cannot comment on it. These authors question the merit of delaying surgery for 48 hours while awaiting the result of a culture report. We suggest that the interval between enucleation and keratoplasty not be regarded as a delay, even though we used the word delay in our article. Comparing moist chamber to tissue-culture medium storage, advocates of the latter emphasize the improved viability of corneas kept for more than 48 hours in a tissue-culture medium. The advantage of tissueculture storage compared with moistchamber storage for periods of less than 48 hours is questionable.

The development of a tissue culture fluid as a means of extending the lifespan of a donor cornea deserves support and encouragement. However, since we presented our paper last

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×