[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.95.166. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1978

Ophthalmodynamometry-Reply

Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(9):1700. doi:10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060306031

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —During the time the intraocular pressure was 120 mm Hg in the right eye and 100 mm Hg in the left eye, the blood pressure was recorded as 132/74 mm Hg. A predicted value for retinal artery systolic pressure would be approximately 110 mm Hg. Considering Schiötz tonometry has some inherent inaccuracy at very low scale readings and high intraocular pressures, we find no real discrepancy in the data reported.Six months after the insult, ophthalmodynamometry was performed by two separate observers with a Bailliart instrument. The direct scale readings were converted to mm Hg using the instrument calibration curve after selecting the appropriate isopter.As Dr Schermer points out, these readings are remarkably low and are inconsistent with the assumed systolic retinal artery pressure during the acute stages. However, the carotid arteriography was obtained four days after the peak intraocular pressures. We speculate that the substantial narrowing

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×