[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.148.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1980

Reliability and Application of the Pneumatonograph-Reply

Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(2):386. doi:10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030380030

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —Very simply stated, two things bothered us about the PTGs Digilab loaned us. One was the under-estimate of IOPs in the glaucoma range. For instance, at an IOP of 35 mm Hg, the horizontally applied PTG probe gave a reading of 30.9 and the vertically applied probe a reading of 29.5 (closed-stopcock measurements on intact eyes simulating clinical tonometry). The other was the gross underestimate of IOP during tonography. In these open-stopcock measurements, an IOP of 35 mm Hg was registered by the PTG (loaded with a 10-g weight) as 25.1, and a pressure of 30 mm Hg was recorded as 21.3.The methods we used have been satisfactory in studies on the Schiötz, Goldmann, and Mackay-Marg tonometers and should be equally satisfactory for the PTG.The PTG depends on very small movements of the probe membrane, of the order of 0.00025 mm per scale unit; this could

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×