[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.153.63. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 1983

Superior Limbic Keratoconjunctivitis-Reply

Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(10):1628-1629. doi:10.1001/archopht.1983.01040020629033

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —I would like to thank Dr Theodore for his review of my article and appreciate these valuable comments from the original describer of SLK relative to the differences between this idiopathic disease and the contact lens-induced "SLK" described by me.It was not my purpose in reporting these cases to suggest a common cause or pathophysiology for idiopathic and contact lens-related SLK. The label was applied because of the almost identical clinical manifestations in these two conditions.The younger age group affected, usual bilaterality, and predominance of female patients in my cases are most likely attributable to characteristics of the cosmetic contact lens population. Since the condition is definitely related to the wearing of lenses, it would not be expected to pursue the chronic course often found in Theodore's SLK and treatment would be expected to be simpler—obviously starting with discontinuance of lens use alone. I would not

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×