[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.72.65. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1984

Limbus- v Fornix-Based Conjunctival Flap in TrabeculectomyA Long-term Randomized Study

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology and the Oscar Johnson Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis. Dr Krupin is currently affiliated with the Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(3):361-362. doi:10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030279018
Abstract

• The safety and success rates of trabeculectomy using fornix-based or limbus-based conjunctival flaps were investigated in a randomized, prospective study. Patients with phakic eyes and uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma had a trabeculectomy with either a standard limbus-based conjunctival flap (18 eyes) or a fornix-based conjunctival flap (19 eyes). Filtration surgery was equally successful (intraocular pressure, ≤21 mm Hg) in both groups independent of the type of conjunctival flap: 17 (94%) of 18 eyes with a limbus-based flap (three eyes with additional medical therapy) and 17 (89%) of 19 eyes with a fornix-based flap (three eyes with additional medical therapy). Four eyes in the fornix-based group showed positive Seidel tests in the early postoperative period. Aqueous leakage was from the suture sites at the lateral margins of the flap and resolved spontaneously without surgical intervention. The fornix-based conjunctival flap was easier to perform, provided better surgical exposure, and was easier to close than the limbus-based flap.

×