[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1984

Psychosocial Characteristics of Candidates for the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study

Author Affiliations

From UCLA (Dr Bourque and Ms Cosand); the Rand Corp, Santa Monica, Calif (Ms Rubenstein); Emory University, Atlanta (Drs Waring and Moffitt); Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami (Dr Gelender); Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia (Dr Laibson); the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Lindstrom); Louisiana State University Eye Center, New Orleans (Dr McDonald); the William Beaumont Eye Clinic, Royal Oak, Mich (Dr Myers); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York (Dr Obstbaum); the McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City (Dr Rowsey); and the Estelle Dohney Eye Foundation, Los Angeles (Dr Schanzlin). A complete list of the PERK Study group members is given at the end of this article.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(8):1187-1192. doi:10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030965027
Abstract

• The National Eye Institute Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study is a multicenter clinical trial for the evaluation of radial keratotomy. This article describes the questionnaire data collected on PERK patients and compares them with a similar group of myopic persons studied during the Rand Health Insurance Experiment (heretofore referred to as the Rand study). The PERK patients are young, white myopes who dislike being dependent on corrective lenses but perceive themselves to be more visually impaired than do comparable Rand study myopes. Most female subjects and a plurality of the male subjects have tried contact lenses and quit wearing them mainly because use of the lenses was inconvenient or bothersome. There is no evidence that patients are psychologically or socially deviant. Both male and female subjects expressed a fear of being without vision and cited impatience with the lenses as their major motivation for wanting surgery.

×