[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1986

Exclusionary Editorial Policy of Peer-Reviewed Publications and the Accuracy of News Tabloids-Reply

Author Affiliations

Associate Editor AMA Specialty Journals Chicago

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(8):1111-1112. doi:10.1001/archopht.1986.01050200017004
Abstract

In Reply.  —Medical news tabloids—or "throwaway journals" or specialty magazines—have existed in an uneasy parallel realm with peer-reviewed scientific journals for some time. Readership studies indicate that these controlled-circulation publications are received and read (or at least scanned) by large numbers of physicians. However, caution has been urged in evaluating original scientific information presented in the tabloids on the grounds that these publications frequently obscure the distinction between extemporaneous clinical observation and proved scientific fact.1,2 The unreliability, incompleteness, and inaccuracy of reporting by the tabloids thus becomes a crucial issue in evaluating the contribution of these publications to the medical community, as indicated by Mr Croes' correspondence. The burgeoning number of these publications in the last five years, which has threatened the economic survival of many peer-reviewed journals by diverting finite advertising revenue in a shrinking marketplace, has intensified the debate surrounding the tabloids' claim to legitimacy.Tabloids and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×