[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.95.166. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1987

The UCLA and PERK Studies-Reply

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(5):610. doi:10.1001/archopht.1987.01060050028007

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —We are pleased that the results of the PERK Study regarding the factors affecting the outcome of radial keratotomy confirmed the findings of the UCLA clinical trial described by Dr Hoffer and colleagues in their preliminary report in 1981. A major difference is present, however. Hoffer and colleagues stated that age did not correlate with the change in refraction in their study. The PERK Study and other studies have demonstrated that older patients achieve a greater change in refraction after radial keratotomy than younger patients, the amount being approximately 0.50 diopters per decade on the average.We fully agree that the role of the corneal curvature in the outcome of radial keratotomy has not been properly defined yet, and further research is needed in this area.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×