[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.184.210. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1988

Clinical Evaluation of a Photorefractor

Author Affiliations

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(8):1031. doi:10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140183007
Abstract

To the Editor.  —Morgan and Johnson's1 clinical evaluation of a commercial photorefractor in the November 1987 Archives illustrates the problems associated with evaluating a screening instrument in a tertiary care setting. Their subjects were highly selected children who were scheduled to undergo complete eye examinations. In fact, among the 57 patients who had analyzable photographs, 34 (59.6%) were confirmed to have an abnormal ocular status. This prior probability of an abnormal result is more than ten times higher than the prior probability of 5% for abnormal ocular status reported in a general population of children.2If we accept Morgan and Johnson's results for the sensitivity of photorefraction as 91% (4.55 to 5.0) and its specificity as 74% (70.3 to 95.0), values that should be unchanged regardless of the prevalence of disease in the population, then the positive predictive value of the test in the general population (calculated from

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×