[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1991

Efficacy of Prism Adaptation in the Surgical Management of Acquired Esotropia

Author Affiliations

Columbia, Mo

Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(6):765. doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080060019002
Abstract

To the Editor.  —The randomized multicenter clinical trial described in the September 1990 issue of the Archives was designed to determine the efficacy of prism adaptation (PA) in the surgical management of acquired esotropia.1 In randomized studies, the control population and the experimental population are evaluated before surgery on an equal basis to avoid observer bias. However, in this study, did the PAR/PS patients (prism adaptation responders undergoing surgery for their deviation determined by Fresnel prism) undergo more measurements of their ocular deviation than the non-PA/ES patients (patients who did not have prism adaptation and who underwent surgery for their deviation determined by prism cover test)? If so, does this bias the results? Could this also explain the resulting difference between PAR/ES patients (prism adaptation responders who underwent surgery for their deviation determined by prism cover test) and PAR/PS patients? Both had PA; however, less surgery was performed on

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×