[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.179.232. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1992

Lyme Disease?-Reply

Author Affiliations

Williamsport, Pa

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):749-750. doi:10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180019003
Abstract

In Reply.  —Dr Winterkorn objects to our association of branch retinal artery occlusion and Lyme disease on two premises: (1) the serologic evidence supports a diagnosis of syphilis and not Lyme disease, and (2) even if our patient had Lyme disease, the artery occlusion was merely a coincidence and not causally related. For the following reasons we believe both objections are unfounded.The serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease is a well-recognized quagmire because of the cross-reactivity of Lyme sera with serologic tests for other spirochetal diseases, including syphilis. Conversely, sera from patients with syphilis can cross-react with the serologic tests for Lyme disease.1,2 Whether or not syphilis is the most common cause of positive Lyme serologic test results in Miami, Fla, is irrelevant since Lyme disease is inarguably a common cause of positive Lyme serologic tests results. Winterkorn asserts without substantiating references that "Lyme disease itself does not produce

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×