[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.213.149. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1992

Figure and Statement Incorrect

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):761. doi:10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180031023

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

—In the article entitled "Argon Laser Photocoagulation for Neovascular Maculopathy: Five-Year Results from Randomized Clinical Trials" published in the August 1991 issue of the Archives (1991;109:1109-1114), the 1.5-month (6-week) recurrence rates were omitted from Fig 4 for all three groups of laser-treated eyes (the legend for Fig 4 was correct, however). Figure 4 is correct as printed on the right.

In addition, a statement in the "Patients and Methods" section was incorrect. On page 1110, the third paragraph in the left column should start as follows: "Recurrent neovascularization contiguous with laser treatment scars (recurrence) was defined as visible leakage of fluorescein dye along the border of a laser treatment scar during fluorescein angiography after treatment.5 The time of the recurrence was classified as the time of the scheduled visit at which the recurrence was noted or, whenever the recurrence was discovered between scheduled visits, the last such visit before

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×